Draft Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Balsall Parish Council search

New search New search

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?

Representation ID: 1990

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Accept conclusions for the borough as a whole but question the distribution and phasing of housing.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think

Representation ID: 1991

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Housing sites to the south of Balsall Common have low accessibility and will poorly integrate into the existing community. Site 1 is closer to the railway station but this does not meet high frequency criteria.
New housing in Balsall Common can only be considered after the construction of HS2 is completed. It will have poor accessibility before then.
There is inequity between the level of housing proposed in Balsall Common and Knowle and Dorridge which has the infrastructure and facilities of 2 small towns.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

No

Draft Local Plan Review

02 Balsall Common - Frog Lane

Representation ID: 1992

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Not the right location. Balsall Street East should remain the southern boundary of the village. Breaching this would make the Green Belt boundary less defensible and generate pressure for further development. Site unlikely to deliver affordable housing, similar to Kenilworth Road.
Need to protect the playing fields.
This number of houses could be accommodated in Knowle and Dorridge.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

01 Balsall Common - Barratt's Farm

Representation ID: 1993

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support. Has potential for good accessibility with the potential to limit the increased use of journeys by car. But its accessibility will be limited because of HS2 construction.
All housing to achieve the target number in Balsall Common could be built on Site 1. It can provide a range of facilities and will link better with the village centre and the railway station.
It would create mixed living opportunities of inter-generational relationships for the elderly and young residents of the village.
It would preserve more of the Green Belt around Balsall Common.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

No

Draft Local Plan Review

03 Balsall Common - Windmill Lane/Kenilworth Road

Representation ID: 1994

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Object. Will be poorly integrated with the existing community, has poor accessibility and should not be considered. The presence of the listed Windmill makes development unacceptable.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the

Representation ID: 1995

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Generally support. New housing in Balsall Common must be built in a location where new facilities such as a school, shops, parking and recreation space can be accommodated. Site 1 could do this.
Support for a bypass which is a piece of critical infrastructure for Balsall Common.
Support for building a new school.
Resulting congestion on the A452 from site 3 cannot be accommodated with minor improvements. Green space with play equipment will be required. The existing primary school is at capacity.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q18. Do you agree with the policies for improving accessibility and encouraging sustainable travel? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 1996

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support a long overdue bypass for Balsall Common to relieve congestion and provide better access for new development. Would create opportunities for cycle paths in the village
Public transport is poor in Balsall Common, this needs to be bettered to accommodate the level of development proposed. A realistic plan for how improvements to public transport are to be achieved must be included in the Local Plan.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q19. Do you agree with the policies for protecting the environment? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 1997

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

With regard to policy P10 it is important to create buffers to any new development so they connect with existing and created green infrastructure assets.
With regard to P14 agree that important trees and hedgerows should be retained.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

No

Draft Local Plan Review

Q20. Do you agree with the policies for quality of place? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 1998

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The policies only have value if they are implemented. Recent developments have not delivered the required amount of space and designs have not been in keeping with the character of the area.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

Yes

Draft Local Plan Review

Q21. Do you agree with the policies health and supporting communities? If not why not, and what alternatives would you suggest?

Representation ID: 1999

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Balsall Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support policy P18. A bypass in Balsall Common would facilitate more sustainable transport modes through the village and improve the health and well being of the community.
However, the loss of playing fields at Holly Lane will have a negative effect on physical and mental health and well being.

Full text:

see attached report
Balsall Parish Council resolved at the Council meeting on 15 February 2017 to submit this report in response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Consultation ending 17 February 2017

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.