Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami search
New searchYes
Draft Local Plan Review
09 Knowle - South of Knowle
Representation ID: 2848
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
welcome proposals to release site 9 from Green Belt to enable the provision of a new start of the art centre for community learning and residential development.
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4342
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
- support the councils spatial strategy conclusion re site 9 (growth option G)
-
-
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q2. Do you agree with the Borough Vision we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4349
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
Support the approach taken by the council
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q4. Do you agree with Policy P1? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4350
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no comment to make
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q5. Do you agree with the key objectives that development is expected to meet as identified in Policy P1 are appropriate? If not why not? Are there any others you think should be included?
Representation ID: 4351
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no comment to make
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q6. Do you agree with Policy P1A? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4352
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no specific comments in response to this question
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q7. Do you agree with Policy P2? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4353
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no specific comments to make on this
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q8. Do you believe the right scale and location of development has been identified? If not why not?
Representation ID: 4355
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no comment to make
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q10. Do you believe the right scale and location of development has been identified? If not why not?
Representation ID: 4356
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no specific comments to make
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q9. Do you agree with Policy P3? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4358
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami
no specific comments to make
joint submission by Arden Academy & Mr Ved Goswami re: Arden Triangle site 9 Knowle
see attached documents
