Draft Local Plan Review

Yes

Representation ID: 4362

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

- Agree with the policy but suggest minor amendments to clarify the wording of the sq/mtr threshold.
-

Yes

Representation ID: 4364

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

Option 1 is the preferred as this is felt to be the more appropriate route for delivering the types of dwellings needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 4366

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

- note the AH level in the DLP but would like to have flexibility in its implementation. this is so that due consideration is given to on-site and enabling infrastructure policy.
- suggest amendments to the wording of the policy

Yes

Representation ID: 4375

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

concerned that an IDP has not been prepared for this stage of the plan preparation but note the likely infrastructure for sites has been identified.
Would like to continue the dialogue with the council on infrastructure for the site.

No

Representation ID: 4376

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

suggest that the wording of the policy is amended and expanded to include a criteria based approach for the assessment of planning applications on sites that have not been allocated, to allow a more responsive approach.

No

Representation ID: 4395

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

regards as excessive the requirement for non-residential development to provide access to bus services at the frequency suggested by the DLP.
size threshold has not been included for non-residential development, which may result in onerous application of the policy on planning applications for smaller developments, extensions etc.
suggest amending 3rd bullet point of the policy.

No

Representation ID: 4412

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

POLICY P11

- Wording in policy P11 relating to water use is too prescriptive. should instead
reference the national standards, which will future-proof the policy against any changes to national standards.
- text in the policy relating to planning obligations in respect of flood risk management schemes is ambiguous and not in compliance with national regs.
-

No

Representation ID: 4418

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

POLICY P13

- overly prescriptive to require all developments to demo that not resulting in sterilisation of mineral resources. an appropriate threshold for development size for requiring such information should be included for proposals for non-mineral development of that development within defined settlement boundaries should be exempt from this requirement.

Yes

Representation ID: 4422

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

fully supportive of the policies, subject to continuing the approach set in the DLP re Green Belt release for 'Arden triangle'

Yes

Representation ID: 4428

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Arden Academy & Mr V Goswami

fully supportive of the policies as currently drafted.