Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Solihull Ratepayers Association search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
04 Dickens Heath - West of Dickens Heath
Representation ID: 1951
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Objection to Site 4:
700 homes is 33% extension to Dickens Heath.
Reduce housing number to 550.
Retain the area between Tythe Barn Lane and the Canal as Green Belt/designated to existing use or Recreation and Sports Grounds.
Strong local support to retain AKAMBA.
Impact on local infrastructure in Dickens Heath village centre, traffic and parking at Whitlocks End station.
Affordable housing for local needs in Dickens Heath.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
11 Shirley - TRW Site
Representation ID: 1952
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Concentration of 2550 homes in this area is excessive.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
12 Shirley - South of Dog Kennel Lane
Representation ID: 1953
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Concentration of 2550 homes in this area is excessive.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
13 Shirley - South of Shirley
Representation ID: 1954
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Objection to Site 13.
2550 homes is excessive in the area.
Seek to retain and Enhance existing open space and a green
Corridor to the Bridleway, Canal, Bills Lane and the wider Countryside for health and well-being benefit of existing and future residents.
Should be no secondary vehicular access to Woodlands and Badgers Estate.
Affordable housing for local needs in Dickens Heath.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think
Representation ID: 2552
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
The concentration of sites 4, 11, 12 and 13 are in such close proximity separated by only roadways or a narrow section of open space/Green Belt resulting in an undue degree of pressure on an already stretched local infrastructure, services and local environmental amenities in the area and on the A34 Corridor.
Risk of damaging community cohesion and the ability of the area to assimilate large additional settlement.
Site allocations should be reviewed and the overall numbers reduced. Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in this area.
Also opportunity for smaller builders.
see attached response
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 2553
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Agree with need to build 6150 extra homes.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2554
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Site selection process has resulted in a disproportionate concentration of new
housing 2550 homes adjacent to the South Shirley Urban Area mainly in Blythe Ward, rather than providing a more even distribution across the borough.
Should have flagged up need for a further assessment stage that limited such a concentration occurring and the adverse impact this would obviously create on the ability of the local infrastructure to assimilate such large scale new development without harming community cohesion.
Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in the South Shirley & Blythe Villages area.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
Representation ID: 2556
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Green Belt around Sites 4, 11, 12 and 13 is too narrow and vulnerable to coalescence between settlements.
Require more qualitative assessment of Green Belt.
Refer to statements on Green Belt in Housing White Paper consultation.
Necessary technical assessments, especially for connectivity and
facilities are not currently available. These are needed to comment on the infrastructure requirements to ensure the proposed sites are deliverable and will not cause undue harm.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q16. Do you believe we have identified the infrastructure[35] required to support these developments? If not why not? Are there any additional facilities you believe are required, if so what are the
Representation ID: 2558
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Sites 4 and 13:
Local infrastructure cannot cope with 2550 new homes in Blythe Ward/south of Shirley.
Traffic on main and feeder roads.
Insufficient parking at Whitlocks End Station.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q11. Do you agree with Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 2559
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Affordable housing policy for local needs on strategic sites in Dickens Heath Parish required.
see attached response