Draft Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Solihull Ratepayers Association search
New searchNo
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)
Representation ID: 2599
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
SHELAA Site 206 is an example of small sub-standard Green Belt sites that would benefit from redevelopment.
Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in the South Shirley & Blythe Villages area.
Also opportunity for smaller builders to develop in line with the recent Government White Paper.
see attached response
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q3. Do you agree with the spatial strategy we have set out? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 4504
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Site selection process has resulted in a disproportionate concentration of new housing (2550 homes) adjacent to the South Shirley Urban Area mainly in Blythe Ward, rather than providing a more even distribution across the borough.
Should have flagged up need for a further assessment stage that limited such a concentration occurring and the adverse impact this would obviously create on the ability of the local infrastructure to assimilate such large scale new development without harming community cohesion.
Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in the South Shirley & Blythe Villages area.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q11. Do you agree with Policy P4? If not why not, and what alternative would you suggest?
Representation ID: 6045
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Affordable housing policy for local needs on strategic sites in Dickens Heath Parish required.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Q14. Do you agree that we are planning to build the right number of new homes? If not why not, and how many do you think we should be planning to build?
Representation ID: 6046
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Agree with need to build 6150 extra homes.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
04 Dickens Heath - West of Dickens Heath
Representation ID: 6047
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
700 homes is 33% extension to Dickens Heath.
Reduce housing number to 550.
Retain the area between Tythe Barn Lane and the Canal as Green Belt/designated to existing use or Recreation and Sports Grounds.
Strong local support to retain AKAMBA.
Impact on local infrastructure in Dickens Heath village centre, traffic and parking at Whitlocks End station.
Affordable housing for local needs in Dickens Heath.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
11 Shirley - TRW Site
Representation ID: 6048
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Concentration of 2550 homes in this area is excessive.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
12 Shirley - South of Dog Kennel Lane
Representation ID: 6049
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Concentration of 2550 homes in this area is excessive.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
13 Shirley - South of Shirley
Representation ID: 6050
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
2550 homes is excessive in the area.
Seek to retain and Enhance existing open space and a green
Corridor to the Bridleway, Canal, Bills Lane and the wider Countryside for health and well-being benefit of existing and future residents.
Should be no secondary vehicular access to Woodlands and Badgers Estate.
Affordable housing for local needs in Dickens Heath.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Alternative Site Suggested (Call for Sites)
Representation ID: 6051
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
SHELAA Site 206 is an example of small sub-standard Green Belt sites that would benefit from redevelopment.
Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in the South Shirley & Blythe Villages area.
Also opportunity for smaller builders to develop in line with the recent Government White Paper.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Q15. Do you believe we are planning to build new homes in the right locations? If not why not, and which locations do you believe shouldn't be included? Are there any other locations that you think
Representation ID: 6052
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
The concentration of sites 4, 11, 12 and 13 are in such close proximity separated by only roadways or a narrow section of open space/Green Belt resulting in an undue degree of pressure on an already stretched local infrastructure, services and local environmental amenities in the area and on the A34 Corridor.
Risk of damaging community cohesion and the ability of the area to assimilate large additional settlement.
Site allocations should be reviewed and the overall numbers reduced. Allocation of smaller Green Belt sites across the Borough could reduce concentration of housing in this area.
Also opportunity for smaller builders.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures