Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Object

Representation ID: 8149

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Cheswick Green Parish Council

Cheswick Green Parish Council strongly objects due to:
- Loss of green belt and conflict with the purposes of including land in the green belt
- False creation of permanent boundary features by creating new roads and infrastructure
- Conflicting information on site area and capacity potentially leading to over development and coalescence
- Disproportionate distribution of development in the area
- Exacerbation of flooding problems
- Detrimental impact on traffic congestion and lack of transport assessment
- Impact on the setting of a listed building and historic landscape features.

Comment

Representation ID: 9302

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Cheswick Green Parish Council

A1 and A2 Cheswick Green - We do not agree with this approach. There is no need to change the Green Belt status of the area in order to deal with proposals to develop any of the sites.

Comment

Representation ID: 9550

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Cheswick Green Parish Council

The development approved at Site 11 provides a suitable and permanent green belt boundary that meets the criteria of the NPPF.
It is confusing that the consultation is seeking views on Site 11 when it received planning permission during the course of the consultation.

Object

Representation ID: 10500

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Cheswick Green Parish Council

- History of flood events in Cheswick Green, that will be only exacerbate in future. Consultation documents do not refer to Flood Report 2019. Concern that increased development will exacerbate existing problems.
- Severe congestion on Creynolds Lane, Tanworth Lane, Dog Kennel Lane and Stratford Road at rush hour.
- New traffic lights at Creynolds lane confuse motorists and have caused accidents
- Poor public transport connectivity in the area
- Will have to drive to station if want to commute by train
- New school will not help to reduce congestion, but add to it

Comment

Representation ID: 10501

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Cheswick Green Parish Council

Cheswick Green PC is extremely concerned that its comments are not being taken into account and that this will ultimately lead to the erosion of the Green Belt in the area.
PC reaffirms and reinforces their opposition to the amount of development proposed for the area including Site 12.
Consultation document confusing, as not clear how much of SHELAA Site 122 is being considered in site selection document.
Text in Site Selection Document about SHELAA Site 122 ends mid-sentence.
Consultation document does not properly consider Site 12 in the description.
Concerned that traffic impacts were not fully assessed before consultation.