Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Search representations

Results for Hockley Heath Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Question 19 - Infrastructure Requirements at Hockley Heath

Representation ID: 7678

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Hockley Heath Parish Council

Representation Summary:

No bus service to Birmingham and infrequent service to Solihull & Dorridge (approx every 45-60 mins).
Development represents 12% increase in village size with no infrastructure improvements.
Possibly 50 more homes with washed over areas.
No medical facilities near Hockley Heath.
Primary school cannot accomodate the number of children from 100-150 dwellings.
Congestion on A3400 (a bypass for M42/M40) leads to School Road being used as a short cut.
Regular flooding on School Road and A3400.
Poor water pressure.
Pockets of village with no access to fibre broadband.
BVP will increase traffic on School Road.

Object

Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Question 20 - Site 25 - School Road

Representation ID: 7683

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Hockley Heath Parish Council

Representation Summary:

School Road is a minor road, floods, poorly lit, experiences congestion, vehicles speed in excess of limit and residents have been concerned about children's safety for some time. SMBC Highways frequently informed by HHPC of excessive speeding.
Large dense development proposed which is out of proportion to area and village.
NP survey results indicate this was the top area residents stated should be protected from development and also indicated greenbelt should be preserved.
School on opposite side to development (no footpath by site 25) so concerned of safety with crossing road.
School Road will be impacted by BVP.

Object

Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Question 21 - Green Belt Changes

Representation ID: 7684

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Hockley Heath Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Hockley Heath Parish Council does not support the potential changes to the Green Belt boundary and would be very concerned if the release of Site 25 (circa 100 units) also led to the release of additional 'washed over' sites with a potential further 50 dwellings being built on School Road in the future. It would have been helpful had the consultation document detailed the existing green belt boundary and the proposed new green belt boundary.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.