Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Search representations
Results for Richard Cobb Planning search
New searchObject
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 39 - Red Sites
Representation ID: 10566
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
Site 86 - Land at Old Station Road Hampton in Arden
Site is recognised as brownfield land on the Register and within a lower performing parcel in the Green Belt Assessment, but site is not isolated with existing development to the south and west which would result in an a defensible boundary. The site has a medium level of accessibility, is within a area of medium landscape sensitivity with low capacity for change, and is suitable for development. The site should be elevated to amber if not green
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 39 - Red Sites
Representation ID: 10567
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
Site 83 - Land at Catherine de Barnes
Site assessment is incorrect. Land is clearly shown outside of Green Belt on previous proposal maps, but site assessment puts it into the Green Belt without justification. Site is bounded by Canal and common land to the north, both defensible boundaries.
Site should be elevated to green or amber
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 39 - Red Sites
Representation ID: 10569
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
Site 422 - Land at Rose Bank, Balsall Street
Site is within moderately performing parcel in the Green Belt Assessment, although it is small but would result boundaries to the south and west which are as defensible as many other sites identified for release. Site has a medium level of accessibility, is in an area of high visual sensitivity with very low capacity for change and is deliverable. Balsall Common is identified as suitable for significant expansion, the site is noted as being suitable for consideration as a windfall site, and should be elevated to green or amber
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 39 - Red Sites
Representation ID: 10570
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
Site 92 - New Mercote Farm Kenilworth Road
Having regards to the previous comments on the need for more employment land in Balsall Common, this site was promoted for that purpose. Site is well contained by the road and rail corridor, and is no more or less isolated from the settlement than other sites being released to the south of the village centre. Site has a good level of accessibility, is in an area of high visual sensitivity with capacity for change. Balsall Common is identified as suitable for significant expansion, and this site would provide a high profile business site for employment in the expanding settlement. Site should be elevated to green or amber
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 39 - Red Sites
Representation ID: 10571
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
Site 91 - Home Farm Berkswell
Site is within highly performing parcel in the Green Belt Assessment, would result in defensible boundaries, and is a natural extension to the existing business park providing local employment ion the local rural community. Site has good level of accessibility, and Balsall Common is identified as suitable for significant expansion. In the absence of the Council providing no new employment sites this site expands on an existing provision. Site should be elevated to green or amber
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation