Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Support

Representation ID: 7592

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

support the council using the standard methodology

Support

Representation ID: 7593

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

we agree with the methodology of the site selection process.

Support

Representation ID: 7594

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Infrastructure Requirements - we agree with the infrastructure requirements identified for Blythe - members emphasised the need to address the Highways congestion specifically at the Millar & Carter/Tanworth Lane Traffic Islands that also cause lengthy peak morning delays in Tanworth Lane and Stretton Road in addition to vehicles exiting Dickens Heath Road from the village.
The need for additional off-street parking at Dickens Heath village was also highlighted

Support

Representation ID: 7595

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

we support the reduction in housing numbers in site 4 and it being included as an allocated site subject to adequate environmental safeguards of natural environmental features and also subject to provision of replacement sports pitches within site 4.
In respect of the draft concept master plan members indicated they would object to the inclusion of site 4 at later stages if provision was not made to accommodate Highgate United FC, Leafield FC and Old Yardleians Rugby Club within site 4.

Support

Representation ID: 7597

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Agree the Green should be included given its present approved planning status.

Support

Representation ID: 7598

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Agree should be included as an allocated site

Support

Representation ID: 7599

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Agree site 26 should be included as an allocated site in respect of the draft concept plan. Members expressed concern at 300 homes and felt 250 was more appropriate given issues currently raised of traffic impact onto Bills Lane and Shakespeare Drive.

Support

Representation ID: 7600

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Agree Removal

Support

Representation ID: 7601

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

Agree remain

Comment

Representation ID: 7602

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association

No
Members supported the retention of the existing unit system as well established and easily understood, it was also felt the present 40% affordable policy was at the very top end of the scale with concern expressed at the level of cross subsidy from market housing falling especially heavily on younger and first time buyers rather than general taxation