Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Comment

Representation ID: 8804

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd - Land North of School Road

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

Whilst we have no objection to Site 10 (west of Meriden), we understand that this site is being promoted by McCarthy and Stone, and we question whether these 100 dwellings are C2 or C3. If this site is intended to be delivered as C2, what contribution does this make towards meeting the Council's overall housing requirement and what contribution, if any, will make towards the overall affordable
housing requirement?

Comment

Representation ID: 8805

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd - Land North of School Road

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

The proposals (for site reference 416) will provide opportunity to link into the wider movement network and nearby public rights of way to encourage accessibility beyond the village into the surrounding countryside

Comment

Representation ID: 8806

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd - Land North of School Road

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

There appear to be inconsistencies in the way that the amber sites have been assessed, e.g. sites 49 and 328 were assessed as amber within the Appendix D to the report to 17th January 2019 Cabinet meeting, which authorised the consultation document; however the Site Assessment document itself now concludes that these sites are 'green'. This should be clarified.

Object

Representation ID: 8807

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd - Land North of School Road

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

We consider our Client's site (reference 416) should be included as a 'green' site. Site is well enclosed by defensible boundaries to the west by Ashford Lane and a detached dwelling; to the south by School Road and a detached dwelling; and to the north by another detached dwelling and agricultural buildings. Do not agree that landscape presents a constraint to development, the character assessment is broad in nature and a more site-specific assessment would arrive at a different conclusion having regard to the context of this site. A number of larger allocations have similar landscape characteristics. Site adjacent to 84 School Lane is assessed as green and our site could result in an identical conclusion. Site contains good accessibility to services and facilities in the village. This includes Hockley Heath Primary School and a bus service to Dorridge, which contains a rail station with direct links to Solihull and Birmingham. Other nearby services in Hockley Heath can be accessed by a short walk or cycle. Hockley Heath should be higher in the settlement hierarchy and identified as suitable for higher levels of growth.
We consider that Hockley Heath is a sustainable location for additional housing growth as it has a sufficient range of services and facilities within the village, including a primary school.

There are no constraints which cannot be mitigated, including heritage, flooding, ecology, trees and access. Development here would not adversely impact upon the character of the settlement.
Improved accessibility is proposed for properties along School Road to and from the village centre through the provision of a footpath.
The site is in single ownership and is available for development with no legal or ownership problems.
It is free from significant constraints and there is strong market demand for housing in this area, it can therefore be considered deliverable (from the point of Local Plan adoption) in terms of the definition within the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 8809

Received: 15/03/2019

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd - Land North of School Road

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

No. This approach would cause uncertainty for developers and the Council and is not likely to work in practice. It would not be clear how much affordable housing will be delivered through the draft Plan. If the Council allocate sufficient sites which have proportionate evidence regarding their viability and deliverability, this would be the best way of addressing the delivery of much-needed affordable housing.