Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Search representations
Results for Turley search
New searchObject
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 44 Are there any other comments
Representation ID: 8190
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Turley
Agent: Turley
The representations are made on behalf of ALDI Stores Ltd. The purpose of the representations is to provide evidence to support a redefinition of the boundaries of the Green Belt at Balsall Common in order to exclude a brownfield site (Site 172) adjacent to Kenilworth Road, at the northern part of the built area of Balsall Common from designation as Green Belt. A detailed case supporting the proposed deletion of green belt designation as a change to the replacement local plan Proposals Map is provided in the attached document.
The representations are made on behalf of ALDI Stores Ltd. The purpose of the representations is to provide evidence to support a redefinition of the boundaries of the Green Belt at Balsall Common in order to exclude a brownfield site adjacent to Kenilworth Road, at the northern part of the built area of Balsall Common from designation as Green Belt. A detailed case supporting the proposed change to the replacement local plan Proposals Map is provided in the attached document.
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 3 - Infrastructure Requirements at Balsall Common
Representation ID: 8247
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Turley
Agent: Turley
The aim of providing an enhanced centre for Balsall Common is noted. However, there are significant constraints operating to limit the extent to which the centre or its immediate environs can accommodate any more than a very modest scale of additional development. The scale of new development planned at Balsall Common is likely to give rise to new investment interest from retail operators whose requirements cannot reasonably be accommodated within or on the edge of the existing centre. Therefore relevant policies should be sufficiently flexible to enable such development to be properly assessed.
The aim of providing an enhanced centre for Balsall Common is noted. However, there are significant constraints operating to limit the extent to which the centre or its immediate environs can accommodate any more than a very modest scale of additional development. The scale of new development planned at Balsall Common is likely to give rise to new investment interest from retail operators whose requirements cannot reasonably be accommodated within or on the edge of the existing centre. Therefore relevant policies should be sufficiently flexible to enable such development to be properly assessed.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Question 8 - Site 22 - Travellion Stud
Representation ID: 8261
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Turley
Agent: Turley
The proposed allocation at Trevallion Stud is generally supported, although the incorporation of site ref 172 of the LPA's 'Site Assessment' document within the proposed allocation site (as shown on the Concept Masterplan drawing) is questioned, since that land area forms part of a separate land ownership, on which separate representations have been made by Turley in the 'Any Other Issues' Chapter. In our view site ref 172 should be removed from the Green Belt, but not allocated for housing.
The proposed allocation at Trevallion Stud is generally supported, although the incorporation of site ref 172 of the LPA's "Site Assessment" document within the proposed allocation site (as shown on the Concept Masterplan" drawing) is questioned, since that land area forms part of a separate land ownership, on which separate representations have been made by Turley in the "Any Other Issues" Chapter. In our view site ref 172 should be removed from the Green Belt, but not allocated for housing.
