Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 13860

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Mrs M Joyce

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that reasonable alternatives have been considered in reaching the decision to relocate and rebuild Arden School. There is no mention of any need for expansion at secondary school level in Knowle/Dorridge in the ‘Infrastructure Delivery Plan’.

The cost of the school proposals may be significantly more than upgrading and extending existing facilities. Arden Academy has had recent upgrades and extensions, which undermines any need and cost justification. There would be potentially larger financial contributions available towards other essential infrastructure needs if the contributions required towards the school proposal were minimised.

Change suggested by respondent:

Robust evidence is required to demonstrate Arden Academy proposals are the most appropriate strategy having regard to reasonable alternatives.

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I submitted these representations yesterday and have just notice that my email gave the wrong client name and so to clarify this particular set of representations are submitted on behalf of our Client Mrs M Joyce (our Ref 10444) in respect of the Draft Submission Solihull Local Plan currently out to consultation.

We should be grateful if you would confirm receipt of these representations and confirm that they will be submitted for consideration by the Local Plan Examination Inspector.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,
Glenda