Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 15053

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson - Arden Green

Agent: Barton Willmore Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

- Note that sole justification of proposing 1,756 homes in Balsall Common is based on settlement including a primary and secondary school, and full range of retail and associated facilities.
- However no significant areas of employment, as supported by SA which states people travel outside of settlement to work.
- Expansion of settlement therefore contrary to sustainability objectives of reducing need to travel to employment areas.
- 1,756 dwellings to single rural village is not a proportional distribution strategy, but completely disproportionate.
- No discussion on how bypass, station car park, improved public transport or primary school will be funded/delivered.
- Reference to scope to enhance existing local centre and provision of a village centre masterplan, but no proposals on what these enhancements would entail or function, especially as a bypass would draw trade away from existing centre.
- No assessment of Balsall Common’s ability to deliver this level of growth, for market to absorb and deliver multiple sites/outlets in such a small area.
- Furthermore, Balsall Common will be acutely affected by HS2, both in terms of physical construction of the line and disruption and uncertainty this will bring, as well as market desirability.

Change suggested by respondent:

Review distribution of growth in Balsall Common.

Full text:

See attachments.ARDEN GREEN – BARRATT DAVID WILSON

Attachments: