No

Representation ID: 1602

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Heyford Developments Ltd

Agent: Avison Young

Welcome approach in Plan. Agree development should be focused in most accessible locations and ensure necessary infrastructure is delivered.
DLP does not define how Council proposes to assess alternative locations for development. Absence of such criteria renders DLP unsound.
Para. 101 should be amended to refer to evidence base.
Para. 107 includes inconsistencies on spatial distribution. Should be reworded to ensure equal consideration of alternative development.
Strongly object to Reviewing the Options paper.
Lack of comparative analysis.
Overestimated site delivery timescales.
Should make more reference to Neighbourhood Plans, e.g. KDBH, and amend Para. 108.