No

Representation ID: 2464

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr S Catton

Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Proportionate evidence not provided in support of proposed allocations or rejection of other sites.
Evidence base is open to challenge, due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes in site assessments. Some crucial evidence base documents are still outstanding.
Object to the misleading assessment of sites 29 and 210 in the SHELAA, the inaccurate accessibility mapping scores and the misleading interim Sustainability Assessment.
There is no overarching commentary for each site.
Would challenge the Green Belt Assessment scores for Knowle site allocations.
All relevant information has not been considered. Decisions have been made which may subsequently be flawed.