No

Representation ID: 5504

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Viv Smith

No robust and detailed appraisal of alternative sites to Site 4 west of Dickens Heath have been carried out, nor have the infrastructure requirements of developing in the green belt been fully examined.
The Green Belt Assessment findings have not been taken into account with some higher performing sites proposed for removal from the green belt, such as Site 4.
There should be a preference for small/medium sized allocations which can be delivered faster, absorbed more easily and made available to smaller builders, rather than large scale allocations proposed.