Object

Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation

Representation ID: 7371

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Golden End Farms

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

We welcome the fact that some of the omission sites have been recognised as having less harm than others and are being reconsidered as 'Amber sites'.

We do however maintain a fundamental concern over the Site Selection Methodology because Step 1 of the process is reliant on a flawed Green Belt Assessment report which has errors in relation to our client's site at Golden End which need to be rectified. See later response to Question 38 for our representation on this matter.

Full text:

We welcome the fact that some of the omission sites have been recognised as having less harm than others and are being reconsidered as 'Amber sites'.

We do however maintain a fundamental concern over the Site Selection Methodology because Step 1 of the process is reliant on a flawed Green Belt Assessment report which has errors in relation to our client's site at Golden End which need to be rectified. See later response to Question 38 for our representation on this matter.