Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7565
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Rebecca Hess
Please see attached letter. My husband and I believe that the methodology of the site selection is flawed and we do not agree that it is logical to consult again on sites that the Council itself has already considered and rejected in recent years. The Amber sites should not have been included in the supplementary consultation. There has been no change to the local and national planning position since the Council's last refusal of planning applications on the land behind 114-118 Widney Manor Road. Garden grab is not the way to provide properly planned housing.
Please see attached letter. My husband and I believe that the methodology of the site selection is flawed and we do not agree that it is logical to consult again on sites that the Council itself has already considered and rejected in recent years. The Amber sites should not have been included in the supplementary consultation. There has been no change to the local and national planning position since the Council's last refusal of planning applications on the land behind 114-118 Widney Manor Road. Garden grab is not the way to provide properly planned housing.