Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7818
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Countryside Planning Services Limited
Agent: Countryside Planning Services Limited
I agree with the methodology adopted for the site selection process: it is objective, logical and based on planning merit. It is notable, however, that the refinement of each site is based on a more subjective assessment of each site. It is reasonable to expect the promoters of each site to provide sufficient evidence on which the refinement should be based. It may not be possible to determine the relative value of those submissions against each other in an objective manner.
I agree with the methodology adopted for the site selection process: it is objective, logical and based on planning merit. It is notable, however, that the refinement of each site is based on a more subjective assessment of each site. It is reasonable to expect the promoters of each site to provide sufficient evidence on which the refinement should be based. It may not be possible to determine the relative value of those submissions against each other in an objective manner.