Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7960
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Ruth Wolinski
We do not agree with the methodology of the site selection process. We object to this further consultation being undertaken on sites that the Council have assessed and rejected. The inclusion of Amber omitted sites gives the promoters of these sites a way in which in our view is contrary to the Councils own assessment and conclusions reached. We live in fear of this further attempt to 'Garden Grab'. In our view the Council should not have included the Amber omitted sites as part of the Supplementary Consultation.
We do not agree with the methodology of the site selection process. We object to this further consultation being undertaken on sites that the Council have assessed and rejected. The inclusion of Amber omitted sites gives the promoters of these sites a way in which in our view is contrary to the Councils own assessment and conclusions reached. We live in fear of this further attempt to 'Garden Grab'. In our view the Council should not have included the Amber omitted sites as part of the Supplementary Consultation.