Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8010
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Steven Rushton
In the report you state that "The majority of sites submitted are not included as a compelling case for their inclusion has not been made; largely because they are located in the Green Belt...." However, this is resulting in what look like common sense sites (eg parts of 33, set amongst existing housing developments) being removed from the plan while green belt such as the land to the south of Dog Kennel Lane (site 12, or122 on the map) is now included in the plan.
In the report you state that "The majority of sites submitted are not included as a compelling case for their inclusion has not been made; largely because they are located in the Green Belt...." However, this is resulting in what look like common sense sites (eg parts of 33, set amongst existing housing developments) being removed from the plan while green belt such as the land to the south of Dog Kennel Lane (site 12, or122 on the map) is now included in the plan.