Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9126
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Dr Paul Rylah
I object to the methodology in so far as , from the onset, it has discounted the most obvious place to develop, that being the so-called Solihull gap, bordering and south of the M42, between junctions 4 and 5. It is the area that will create the least traffic congestion for existing communities, is significantly larger than the total area required for development, and hence can easily be developed while still maintaining a "gap". A methodology that omits the serious consideration of this area must be deeply flawed.
I object to the methodology in so far as , from the onset, it has discounted the most obvious place to develop, that being the so-called Solihull gap, bordering and south of the M42, between junctions 4 and 5. It is the area that will create the least traffic congestion for existing communities, is significantly larger than the total area required for development, and hence can easily be developed while still maintaining a "gap". A methodology that omits the serious consideration of this area must be deeply flawed.