Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9394
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Christopher Fellows
Representation Summary:
Concerns about consistency of application of methodology.
- difficult to see how some sites included as green in Step 2, when identified as priority 5 or above in Step 1, and Sustainability Appraisal identifies more negative than positive effects.
- some sites are indicated as having no defensible boundary, when these do have clearly marked boundaries. Other sites have been proposed providing suitable boundaries can be provided.
- some sites excluded because they are isolated, whereas others included because they could become attached to larger parcels of land.
Examples provided in response to questions 6-9, 38, 39 and 44.
Full text:
see full details in attached response