Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9400
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr M Trentham
Representation Summary:
I disagree with para 380 that "settlements.... contribute to the openness of the Green Belt". It may be that the layout of a settlement precludes the establishment of a logical boundary around it, and that may be a reason for maintaining washed-over status. Otherwise settlements should not be washed over. Infilling could result over time in the sensible removal of the settlement from the washed-over area as proposed by the Council for those areas in para 378. This is also the case described in Q36 below.
Full text:
see letter of response re: Knowle sites