18 Solihull - Sharmans Cross Road
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4344
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: G P Warren
Object to housing Site 18 as previously objected to planning application which was refused, and points relating to loss of amenity, potential traffic problems, environmental/ecological damage and loss of green space remain relevant, and proposal for significantly larger development.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4346
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Y A Warren
Object to housing Site 18 due to loss of amenity for sports activities, unsympathetic and over intensive development out of keeping with surrounding area and increased traffic and parking problems.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4408
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Paul Ponsonby
Object to housing Site 18 as it is a much needed sporting facility for which there is local demand that is being ignored, density is far too high and out of character with surrounding area, would put at risk trees on site and worsen already significant flooding problem, and would make already significant traffic problems on road unbearable leading to road safety issues.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4409
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rhys Ponsonby
Object to housing Site 18 as site is valuable amenity for local residents and should be protected for sport and recreation use, will be detrimental to character of area, put unacceptable pressure on local schools and medical services, and would exacerbate already bad traffic congestion especially in peak times.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4411
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: S A Kirby
Development would cause considerable loss of amenity in the Sharmans Cross area. The increased traffic would endanger children attending the adjacent school and cause further obstruction to emergency services who use the road for rapid response
There is already roadside parking which would be made worse.
Flooding and drainage issues at times of heavy rainfall which would be made worse by the development.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4413
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Rosemary Bowcott
Overdevelopment of site. Over 2 storeys high will result in loss of light and privacy.
Out of character.
Land has been safeguarded for sporting use only. Sporting facilities are precious and should not be lost.
Schools and services will suffer.
Existing flooding issues.
Added pressure to additional congestion and school traffic.
Access from Winterbourne Road would result in too much traffic, roads are too narrow.
Whole idea unviable.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4427
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: M E Tregellas
Understand the old rugby ground is designated land for sport. Losing another facility would leave us very short of green open spaces.
100 homes is overdevelopment of the site.
Will increase risk of flooding.
Increase in traffic will be catastrophic. Regular accidents and gridlocking at peak times.
Significant increase in danger for school children.
Local amenities, e.g. schools, are unlikely to cope with added population.
Council will have to provide additional schools, medical and sporting facilities.
Understand that Oakmoor have acquired a house on Sharmans Cross Road to enable access.
Access from Winterbourne Road is not supported.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4431
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Michael Sims
Land should continue as community use for recreation and children.
Important for health and wellbeing.
Loss of wildlife.
Young families need this facility.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4433
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Melvyn Broadhurst
Out of character with the area.
Traffic, congestion, pollution.
Add pressure to local resouraces.
Sports area is unique feature and should be kept for sport.
Volunteers have contributed a lot.
Should not give up freehold.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4434
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Robert J Price
Loss of sports ground. Inadequate supply in Solihull.
Cheap-cost housing is out of character with surrounding area.
Loss of green space and green character.
Doctors, primary schools and other local services are not 'accessible' in accordance with NPPF.
Parking would be inadequate.
Local sewerage system overloaded.
Site been designated for sporting uses only by Council.
Should be leased for sport and not social housing.
See Attachment
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4944
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: UK Land Development (UKLD)
Agent: Savills
Solihull Arden Club in active use.
Existing access is poor, likely that wider access would be required to serve residential development.
If Tennis Club excluded from allocation, yield would be ca. 69 dwellings.
Development of sports pitch would be loss of recreational land.
It would be necessary to consult with Sport England on this matter.
Draft Local Plan Representations - UKLD Smiths Lane Bentley Heath Knowle
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5599
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Karen Trueman
Permanent loss of sporting facilities when support should be given for open space and recreation. There is a demand from sports teams to use the facilities and there is a covenant that restricts usage for sports use only.
Additional traffic will exacerbate existing problems of congestion and pollution. Impact on highway safety and health and well being of pedestrians, including school children and cyclists.
Parking arrangements for the proposed houses are likely to be cramped and there will be a reduction in parking for the Tennis Club which will compound existing problems on side roads.
Impact on flooding and wildlife.
see letter re: site 18
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6063
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6096
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6131
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6162
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6192
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6229
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Existing narrow single point of access off Sharmans Cross Road would be inadequate.
Circa half of site is in regular use as a sport and community facility by the Solihull Arden Club.
Allocation of land in its entirety is contrary to NPPF objectives on community health and well-being.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6441
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mark Horgan
Agent: Savills
SHELAA states that key suitability issues are upgrading the existing road access and bad neighbour use with no potential for mitigation.
Submission includes demolition of a house to increase access - Owner of dwelling on Sharmans Cross Road is unwilling to relocate.
Further detail is required to determine deliverability.
We have spoken to Solihull Arden Club who have not been part of land promotion process, do not want to relocate or stop operations, and do not know if use is included in the site.
A recreational space assessment still needs to be undertaken.
LWS on site also.
Please find attached our response on behalf of Mark Horgan to the Draft Local Plan Review consultation. We have also attached our Scope, Issues and Options (January 2016) submission for your reference.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6456
Received: 11/01/2017
Respondent: Mr Matthew Stewart
Area 17 and 18 should not be included as they are already established areas and the infrastructure will have an adverse effect on the existing area
Area 17 and 18 should not be included as they are already established areas and the infrastructure will have an adverse effect on the existing area