Policy P3 Provision of Land for General Business and Premises

Showing comments and forms 1 to 17 of 17

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10789

Received: 12/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

While provision is being made for JLR needs at Damson Parkway and Arden Cross, and much of that is to be welcomed in the two main areas of residential growth – Knowle and Balsall Common – no provision has been made of land for employment purposes to help to create a balanced community rather than commuter villages where the population has to travel usually by car to employment opportunities elsewhere. In both those communities’ provision should be made in the Local Plan for a modest amount of employment land.

Change suggested by respondent:

In Balsall Common allocate sites for employment purposes on one or more af the following sites
• Lavender Hall Farm site BC6
• Call for Sites site 1 – Springhill, 443 Station Road, Balsall Common
• Call for Sites site 43 – Land adjacent to Old Lodge Farm, Kenilworth Road

In Knowle an area within the Arden Triangle a suitable site should be allocated for employment uses.

Full text:

While it is clearly important in the Local Plan to address the issue of providing sufficient land for housing over the plan period, it is apparent that less serious attention has been given to the provision of new land for employment purposes.
The allocation of Site UK2 on land at Damson Parkway in the Policies Map, is to be released from the Green Belt to accommodate employment development, including that required for JLR operational needs or to enable JLR component suppliers, needed to directly support JLR operational needs, to be located close to the plant. That land has also been earmarked for the relocation of the existing public Civic Amenity Recycling site presently sited at Arden Eco Park
Arden Cross is being promoted as providing for housing as well as other uses including such as research and development and advanced manufacturing as part of an innovation district for employment and higher education.
The Council has readily diluted the original business allocation of Blythe Valley Park and other business parks with significant residential development.
While much of that is to be welcomed in the two main areas of residential growth – Knowle and Balsall Common – no provision has been made of land for employment purposes to help to create a balanced community rather than commuter villages where the population has to travel usually by car to employment opportunities elsewhere. In both those communities’ provision should be made in the Local Plan for a modest amount of employment land.
In Balsall Common sites such as
• Lavender Hall Farm site BC6
• Call for Sites site 1 – Springhill, 443 Station Road, Balsall Common
• Call for Sites site 43 – Land adjacent to Old Lodge Farm, Kenilworth Road

In Knowle an area within the Arden Triangle a suitable site should be allocated for employment uses.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10805

Received: 12/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Arden Eco Park was submitted under the Call for Sites as an employment site as it is long established as such. However the site never been properly considerd by the LPA.

The site is strategically placed in the UK Central Zone and should be considered as a site for a Power from Waste development to service Arden Cross development area directly to the north.

That would be stategically located and make use of this brownfield site.

Change suggested by respondent:

Arden Eco Park should be allocated as a site for a Power from Waste site to service Arden Cross.

Full text:

The wider former Arden Brickworks site, now called Arden Eco Park, covers a total area of around 38.6 hectares (95.4 acres). The Eco Park site is accessed from the A45 via a one-way service road running on the south side of and parallel to the A45 between Stonebridge Island to the east, at the junction of the A45/A452, and M42/J6 to the west.

The Arden Eco Park lies within the M42 Solihull Economic Gateway with additional expansion proposed to this gateway. It is located in the West Midlands Green Belt in the Meriden Gap which separates Birmingham from Coventry and is largely surrounded by agricultural land apart from a large Kennel complex – Top Hat Kennels - on the frontage which is likely to be directly affected by HS2, and Pasture Farm to the east. The HS2 line is due to pass just to the east of Arden Eco Park leading into the new Interchange Station north of the A45.

Birmingham International Airport, the National Exhibition Centre and Birmingham International Station are located around 2 miles to the north west accessed off the A45 to the west of the M42.

Future development of the site

As such Arden Eco Park is a major previously developed site in a strategic position and already operates a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) at the rear of the site alongside the remaining areas of clay extraction. The Local Plan recognises the clay extraction operation as well as the MRF as established facilities.

The major frontage part site comprises a Civic Amenity Facility which has operated for many decades to service the wider Solihull community but is proposed to be relocated to a site near Damson Parkway which for many is likely to be less accessible that the present facility at Bickenhill. HS2 will run directly adjacent to the eastern boundary and Adren Cross is directly on the north side of the A45.

Behind the Civic Amenity site lie a large number of business units used by utility and civil engineering companies for offices and ancillary facilitate as well as open storage (B8) with ancillary facilities mainly covered by a Certificate of Lawful use granted by the LPA in 2007 (ref 2007/ 1171). The site comprises a large area of hardstanding a range of buildings in brick or profiled steel buildings which have largely replaced the former brickwork buildings.

The owners of the land have ambitions to establish a major Power from Waste facility on this site which would make a major contribution to the energy needs of the area around including the Arden Cross development area around the HS2 Interchange with over 5000 new houses as well as business development.

The Arden Eco Park site has been submitted under the Council’s Call for Sites in relation to the Local Plan as land for business and employment uses given into extensive past history. The Local Plan has not recognised that submission and no provision is being made in the plan for the site to contribute positively to needs of the Solihull Economic Gateway which it is well placed to do.

No provision is made in the Plan for dealing with major brownfield sites in the Solihull Local Plan which are included within many other local plans. Leaving it to the development management process is not sufficient to give a proper and appropriate policy framework for considering proposals. In the future.

The Arden Eco Park site should be allocated as a site for energy from waste and other related development.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 10919

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan does not properly address the need for provision of land for Local employment uses in Balsall Common and Knowle.

Change suggested by respondent:

Allocate land for employment uses on Balsall Common and Knowle

Full text:

While it is clearly important in the Local Plan to address the issue of providing sufficient land for housing over the plan period, it is apparent that less serious attention has been given to the provision of new land for employment purposes.
The allocation of Site UK2 on land at Damson Parkway in the Policies Map, is to be released from the Green Belt to accommodate employment development, including that required for JLR operational needs or to enable JLR component suppliers, needed to directly support JLR operational needs, to be located close to the plant. That land has also been earmarked for the relocation of the existing public Civic Amenity Recycling site presently sited at Arden Eco Park
Arden Cross is being promoted as providing for housing as well as other uses including such as research and development and advanced manufacturing as part of an innovation district for employment and higher education.
The Council has readily diluted the original business allocation of Blythe Valley Park and other business parks with significant residential development.
While much of that is to be welcomed in the two main areas of residential growth – Knowle and Balsall Common – no provision has been made of land for employment purposes to help to create a balanced community rather than commuter villages where the population has to travel usually by car to employment opportunities elsewhere. In both those communities’ provision should be made in the Local Plan for a modest amount of employment land.
In Balsall Common sites such as
• Lavender Hall Farm site BC6
• Call for Sites site 1 – Springhill, 443 Station Road, Balsall Common
• Call for Sites site 43 – Land adjacent to Old Lodge Farm, Kenilworth Road

In Knowle an area within the Arden Triangle a suitable site should be allocated for employment uses.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 11077

Received: 15/12/2020

Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Birmingham business park allocation is directly adjacent a designated Local Wildlife Site, with no mention of a buffer in the policy wording, or consideration of impact on the amenity of the neighbouring site.

Full text:

See Attached Word doc.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 11156

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: IM Properties - Land west of Stratford Road

Agent: Marrons Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Policy P3 fails to match the spatial strategy of the Plan and has no regard to the evidence of the HEDNA in relation to supply and demand along the A34 corridor.

It is unsound for the Council to suggest that an early review of the Plan is an appropriate response in addressing unmet needs- deferring cross-boundary strategic matters.

Other factors need to be taken into consideration in informing the employment land requirement- the existing stock available, pattern of supply, and evidence of market demand.

The land currently available on the five existing allocations is less than what is stated within the Plan. The existing supply amounts to 6.4ha of employment land on three sites, but soon to fall to 3.4ha on two sites.

The delivery of two large employment allocations is uncertain and their trajectory is likely to be much later in the plan period.

Change suggested by respondent:

The employment requirement should be set out within a strategic policy within the Plan.

The employment requirement should be increased to reflect past performance, the market evidence of supply and demand, the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands Combined Authority and the unmet needs of the Black Country Authorities.

Evidence should be provided as to the availability and deliverability of the proposed allocations and the trajectory for their delivery.

Additional employment sites should be allocated to address the additional employment land requirement to ensure a continuous supply. Site 62 (Land west of Stratford Road) should be allocated as a mixed use allocation comprising residential and employment.

Full text:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please see attached multiple representations on behalf of IM Properties in respect of land west of Stratford Road (Site 62).

Kind Regards,

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 13998

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: WSP

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

According to the five criteria for the assessment of alternative uses in policy P3 a waste management centre or council deport would not be deemed appropriate.
The site does not lack prospects for its future development, nor does it require extensive marketing to identify potential interest, as this exists in the form of Jaguar Land Rover, as identified in Policies P1, P3, UK2 and the Council’s objectives to support its continued growth.
Finally, the provision of a waste management facility that would severely constrain the continued
growth of an existing, prosperous and beneficial employer does not constitute the best use of land,
contrary to the NPPF.
A waste management facility and depot,
however, would not provide employment densities of the same level of the operations of JLR based on the site’s function and use of space, nor does it support the continued large-scale growth of an existing large
employer.

Change suggested by respondent:

Objects to the addition of the proposal for the waste and recycling centre and Council depot to be relocated within the UK2 allocation through policy UK2.

Full text:

We write on behalf of our client, Jaguar Land Rover, to submit a response to the publication of the
Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020 (Reg 19) consultation (the ‘Draft Submission Plan’).
Jaguar Land Rover’s Lode Lane manufacturing site (the ‘site’) employs approximately 7,000
people, operating 24 hours a day to meet the global demand for Range Rovers and the Jaguar FPACE.
It forms one of the largest employment sites in the West Midlands and is Jaguar Land
Rover’s largest manufacturing facility in the UK.
This site bounds the draft employment land allocation UK2 at Damson Parkway, Solihull (formerly
known as Proposed Employment Site 20 in earlier versions of the draft Plan), with specific
reference made to the site providing expansion opportunities for Jaguar Land Rover.
Jaguar Land Rover support the principle of allocating employment land at draft allocation UK2.
Jaguar Land Rover does however have serious and grave concerns with some of the detail of draft
allocation UK2 as submitted for Regulation 19 consultation, and requests Solihull MBC takes into
account the detail of this letter and makes the requested changes to this policy.
Concerns with draft Policy UK2
The recently published Draft Submission Plan October 2020 (Reg 19) amends the previous
wording of draft Policies UK2 – Land at Damson Parkway and P12 – Resource Management to
include an option for the provision of a relocated Household Waste and Recycling Centre and
Council Depot within the land allocation. Jaguar Land Rover has serious and grave concerns
regarding this addition within the allocation and does not support this amendment, due to following
potential implications:
▪ The potential impact on the future site expansion of Jaguar Land Rover’s Solihull
manufacturing facility;
▪ The potential impact on the future aspirations of creating direct access to the new M42
Junction 6 road link; and
▪ The non-compliance with adopted Policy P3 Provision of Land for General Business
and Premises.
Page 2
Future expansion
The continued expansion and growth of the largest of Jaguar Land Rover’s UK manufacturing sites
and one of the West Midlands’ largest employers, is largely constrained on the north, south and
west by the neighbouring urban form and protected Elmdon Park. Land to the east of the facility is
the only area that could accommodate growth. It is therefore essential that this land is protected for
the future expansion needs of Jaguar Land Rover.
As a recognised Key Economic Asset contributing to Solihull and creating a substantial number of
local skilled employment opportunities, the Solihull Local Plan Review reinforces the Council’s
objective to support Jaguar Land Rover’s continued economic success, understanding their need
to stay competitive and the requirement for growth through the proposed allocation of employment
land site Ref: UK2 (adopted and draft Policy P1). Site UK2 identifies the only area available for the
Lode Lane facility’s expansion, to the north/east of the existing site.
The land to the immediate north of the existing facility, to the west of Damson Parkway, was
granted consent for development in conjunction with the continued operation of Jaguar Land
Rover. The location of this development infills the remaining available land to the west of Damson
Parkway and south of the A45.
The proposed amendment to the justification text of Policy UK2 notes that part of the draft
allocation, to the south east of Damson Parkway, has been identified as an option for the relocation
of the Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Council depot. This area of land bounds Jaguar
Land Rover’s existing dispatch lot to the east.
The development of a Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Council depot in this location
would result in the total enclosure of Jaguar Land Rover’s Lode Lane facility, developing the last
area of land available as a natural extension to the existing facility’s footprint.
Further details would also be needed to understand the security provisions of any facility which
bounds our site. There is a potential to weaken defensible boundaries and pose additional security
risks.
Prior to the recent amendments to the wording of Policy UK2, the proposed allocation supported
Paragraphs 80 and 82 of the NPPF, seeking to create an identified area of employment land for
the continued growth and expansion of Jaguar Land Rover and/or for the addition of alternative,
complementary automotive use, creating a cluster of industry.
The proposed provision of a waste treatment facility and depot would result in the inability for the
continued growth of the existing large-scale local employer, one of the largest in the West
Midlands, contrary to their adopted and draft Local Plan and the National Planning Policy
Framework (2019) (‘NPPF’).
As such, Jaguar Land Rover request that the Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Council
depot are not located within draft allocation UK2.
Future connectivity to the highway network
Highways England has recently obtained consent for a series of works between Junction 5 and
Junction 6 of the M42, resulting in the creation of a 2.4km dual carriageway link road aligned to the
A45 and access via Junction 5A. This area of the M42 currently supports road access to
Birmingham Airport and significant business locations, such as the UK Central Solihull Hub Area.
Page 3
The justification for these works is supported by the current, significant congestion issues that form
a constraint to any future investment and economic growth in this area. The benefits of the scheme
once complete will be an increase in capacity at Junction 6, reduced congestion, improved access
to key business areas in the region, and improved local cycle and pedestrian routes.
There is a future aspiration to connect Damson Parkway directly with this new dual carriageway.
Such a link road would create a more direct route between the UK2 allocation and the M42,
directing traffic away from the existing routes and improving capacity on the local and strategic
road network. This could also allow for further economic development opportunities in the local
area in the future.
The route for such a link road is not yet known, nor has a case been made for it. As such, Jaguar
Land Rover is not asking Solihull MBC to protect the potential route but merely ensure the Local
Plan and allocation UK2 is sufficiently flexible to incorporate this road should it be needed during
the plan period between (2020-2036).
There is an aspiration to have rail freight connectivity serving the allocation to ensure future logistic
capability for all parties. Any plan policy should protect this aspiration.
Policy P3 assessment
Adopted Policy P3 protects allocated employment land for their allocated purposes and
employment uses defined as offices, industrial and warehousing, and where appropriate, waste
management. The amendment to the wording of Policy UK2 seeks to include waste management
as an appropriate land use at Damson Parkway.
Considering site UK2, it is located on both sides of Damson Parkway. The surrounding land
comprises the Jaguar Land Rover Lode Lane facility and its phased extension to the south of the
A45, whilst within the wider site there are several residential dwellings, a gypsy traveller site and
other small, home-based businesses.
Policy UK2 states that the waste treatment centre and depot would be located within the allocation,
understood to comprise the two land parcels to the east and north of Jaguar Land Rover’s dispatch
lot.
Based on the existing site uses and in the interest of enabling the continued growth of Jaguar Land
Rover, a waste management facility is not deemed appropriate in this location.
Policy P3a sets out five criteria for the assessment of alternative uses:
▪ Site is relatively isolated from other business premises or neighbouring uses;
▪ Demonstrated that there is no longer a need to retain the site for their intended
business class purpose; or
▪ There is no reasonable prospect of attracting business development in market terms;
▪ The alternative use will support sustainable development principles and directly deliver
employment locally; and
▪ There is no conflict with policies of the Local Plan or National Planning Policy.
Against the aforementioned criteria, a waste management site and Council depot in this location
would not be deemed appropriate. The proposed location is in proximity to a 24-hour operating
business, which is continuing to expand into the wider area. Furthermore, its neighbours include
Page 4
residential dwellings to the north and south, which are not directly compatible with a waste
treatment facility.
The site in its current form does not lack prospects for its future development, nor does it require
extensive marketing to identify potential interest, as this exists in the form of Jaguar Land Rover,
as identified in Policies P1, P3, UK2 and the Council’s objectives to support its continued growth.
The continued growth of one of the West Midland’s largest employers, in proximity to the existing
facility ensuring a concentrated operation, provides a clear rationale for supporting sustainable
development and the delivery of local employment. A concentrated approach reduces the travel
and movement of goods and people across Solihull, supporting the best use of space with their
dense development footprint maximising employment opportunities for skilled workers within the
local community.
Finally, the provision of a waste management facility that would severely constrain the continued
growth of an existing, prosperous and beneficial employer does not constitute the best use of land,
contrary to the NPPF. Jaguar Land Rover currently employ approximately 7,000 people at the
Solihull facility, with any expansion allowing for increasing figures and generating employment
rates in keeping with business use class densities. A waste management facility and depot,
however, would not provide employment densities of the same level based on the site’s function
and use of space, nor does it support the continued large-scale growth of an existing large
employer.
CONCLUSION
Jaguar Land Rover support the principle of employment land at draft allocation UK2 within the
Draft Submission Plan, supporting the continued growth and operation of employment uses within
the area.
Notwithstanding, the amended wording of draft policy UK2 identifies the allocation as a potential,
appropriate option for the relocation of a Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Council
Depot. Jaguar Land Rover do not consider the provision of this option within site UK2 is an
appropriate location for this operation, based on its existing local context. Such a facility, located in
the south east of the allocation, would prejudice the future expansion and continued growth of
Jaguar Land Rover’s Solihull facility. It would potentially prejudice future connectivity with
Highways England’s M42 Junction 6 relief road and does not constitute an appropriate location as
per the adopted Policy P3a assessment.

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14095

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Arden Cross Ltd

Agent: Turley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The table accompanying this policy identifies Land at HS2 Interchange (Policy P1 and UK1) as providing circa 140ha.
The Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment (“HEDNA”) dated October 2020 sets out the assumed employment floorspace figures derived from the UGC and Arden Cross masterplanning work.
Paragraph 145 of the plan states that “evidence indicates that Site UK1 is likely to have a role to play in meeting local employment needs, especially later in the Plan period.” This refers to evidence in the HEDNA regarding the upper end of the need for office accommodation which ACL considers to be realistic

Full text:

see attached document

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14200

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: IM Properties - Employment Land

Agent: Turley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The employment land supply set out in Policy P3 is inadequate to meet the longer term needs of the borough for industrial and warehousing land. This is based on two premises:
(a) The HEDNA underestimates local industrial and warehousing need by some margin
(b) The plan does not address the acknowledged need for strategic employment sites based on the 2015 study

Policy P3 should plan for a higher amount of industrial floorspace (between 22.1 and 60.7ha ) than what was concluded in the HEDNA.

The approach of the HEDNA is justified however there are a number of shortcomings to the specific method used by the HEDNA:

• Tables 101 and 102 appear to contain errors, incorrectly transposing the VOA data cited at Table 100;
• The decision to use only a two year margin is insufficiently justified where it is commonplace to apply a more generous five year margin, to ensure sufficient flexibility in the supply calculated as being needed; and
• There is insufficient justification for the dismissal of recent evidence of much stronger growth in the industrial stock, when focusing on the period back to 2011 rather than the longer-term period back to 2001.

Recent employment changes have been the result of structural changes in the distribution and retail / e-commerce markets which are acknowledged within the HEDNA. The UK has emerged as the third largest online shopping market in the world and the largest in Europe.

The demand for logistics space is directly related to changes in the size of the population. The HEDNA confirms, with reference to various scenarios, including one incorporating the UKC Hub, that the population of Solihull is projected to increase significantly. It has been evidenced that as the population grows, there is likely to be a corresponding increase in consumer demand and the need for warehouse space. The HEDNA confirms that the population of Solihull has grown at a greater rate over more recent years, with Figure 9 suggesting that the rate of growth will increase to an even greater extent when meeting even the minimum need for housing implied by the standard method.

Using VOA data and incorporating data from March 2020 the annual net change in industrial/warehouse floorspace shows a rising trend in the past decade. Last year’s data (2019/20) shows a new record level of growth, a continuation of the short-term trend would see more pronounced growth than the longer-term trend.
Accounting for last years growth would identify a greater need than the 16ha concluded in the HEDNA. Even if the short-term trend was not sustained it would be reasonable to conclude that a more representative position would fall somewhere within this range of between 19 and 52 ha. In the context of the evidence relating to sustained growth of e-commerce and a projected strong local growth in population that the upper end is more likely to represent a reasonable level of need to be planned for, to ensure the plan’s resilience.
Even the lower end of this need aligns with the Labour Demand Growth Scenario identifying a need for 19.1 ha, this should be the absolute minimum to be planned for. If flexibility of 5 years take up was included it would be sensible to plan for between 22.1 and 60.7ha.
This strongly indicates that the shortfall in industrial land to which the Plan should respond, in quantitative terms alone, is much higher than concluded in the HEDNA.

Full text:

See attached - employment Land Reps

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14201

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: IM Properties - Employment Land

Agent: Turley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The plan is unclear about the role of the land at Damson Parkway in Policy UK2 which, at one level, is significant in terms of site area when measured against the HEDNA’s assessment of local need, but in policy terms is identified as capable of meeting the specific and unique needs of JLR and/or the airport. What proportion is expected to meet local needs or, whether as part of UKC Hub, it is in effect a strategic site requires clarification.
In either event, market evidence points to a need to identify a more robust supply of industrial and warehouse land as there are very unlikely to be any windfall sites and the only other option would be to consider removal from the Green Belt which should take a plan-led approach.


The HEDNA infers that UKC Hub employment growth scenario and related developments at UK1 and UK2 are intended to accommodate a combination of both local and strategic needs.

The amount of strategic warehousing accounted for as part of UKC is modest and does not take account of the acknowledged sub-regional shortage in the provision of strategic employment sites in this market area.

The 2015 West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study13 (WMSESS) highlighted an immediate need for additional sites across the region.
An updated second stage of the WMSESS is awaiting publication and it is anticipated that this will reaffirm the immediate shortage of strategic employment sites, with a specific focus on the M42 corridor including Solihull. The draft Plan does not adequately acknowledge or respond to this need for strategic sites and when the study is published and identifies such a need, it will be necessary for the Plan to engage with the issue positively.

Full text:

See attached - employment Land Reps

Attachments:

Support

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14209

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: IM Properties - Employment Land

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Fore Business Park is an existing allocation in the Plan, under Policy P1. IM are very supportive of this allocation, it is relevant to note that given the success of the current park, and that much of the floorspace approved through previous planning permissions has been built out, it is unlikely that any significant further floorspace would be brought forward within this location. This is further reinforced by the presence of Green Belt to the north of the site, preventing any significant future expansion in this direction

Full text:

See attached - employment Land Reps

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14243

Received: 12/11/2020

Respondent: Meriden Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy P3 compromises established businesses and the community with the vast amount of traffic and pushing out smaller community businesses. Planning policy should encourage small independent businesses rather than large chains.

Full text:

Good evening

Please see attached letter from Meriden Parish Council in response to Solihull’s Draft Local Plan consultation.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14263

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: St Mowden Developments Ltd

Agent: JLL

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

JLL considers the approach of the Submission Draft to the provision of industrial and warehouse floor space to be deeply flawed on a number of grounds. These are summarised below.
The principal evidence base to the submission draft, G L Hearn’s HEDNA, has under-estimated substantially the local need for development land for industry and warehousing. GL Hearn has mishandled primary recent evidence on increases in industrial floor space and ignored clear market signals which show a significant imbalance between demand and supply.
The supply of sites to meet local need is wholly insufficient, both quantitatively and qualitatively. It provides a very restricted offer to companies looking to expand or invest in Solihull.
The approach to identifying and delivering employment land to meet local needs for industry and warehousing does not accord with the guidance set out in PPG on Economic need. In addition, it is not justified by its principal evidence base. As such, Policy P3 is unsound in terms of meeting local need for industry and warehousing.
The Submission Draft makes no allowance for large scale logistics. Indeed, the Submission Draft and G L Hearn’s HEDNA make no reference to this sector. This is a significant failing given the circumstances: -
■ Paragraph 82 of the NPPF requires planning authorities to make pro-vision for logistics operators of a variety of scales and in suitably ac-cessible locations.
■ The clear guidance in PPG for strategic authorities to identify the scale of the need for logistics and consider the most appropriate lo-cations to meet those needs.
■ The signposting by the 2015 West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study of a “severe shortage” in supply, relative to demand, of development land to accommodate this sector.
■ Similar conclusions by the successor study to the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study, currently in draft form but with its conclusions well known to the strategic authorities (as part of the commissioning group), which refers to an “urgent need” for addi-tional sites to be brought forward.
■ The recognised strength of the logistics market and the growing gap between demand and supply in this location.
The West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study 2015 identified Solihull as forming part of the M42 corridor (Area A) and considered this to be an area of high demand for big box logistics, with supply “severely short”. It recommended that local studies should be commissioned to identify specific opportunities and assess policy implications. Unfortunately, no such study has been carried out for Area A. Solihull, as the authority with the greatest access to this stretch of the M42, should have taken a leading role, but has not done so.
Solihull, North Warwickshire, Birmingham and Tamworth – the principal local planning authorities in this area – have simply failed to engage on this issue. This has resulted in very little new land being identified in Local Plans to meet future demand. This is a chronic failure of the Duty to Co-operate.
Similarly, there seems to be a lack of engagement between Birmingham and Solihull – which form part of the same LEP – about how Solihull could take a role in accommodating the significant identified overspill of employment land need for Birmingham.
These omissions are fundamental. They result in the Submission Draft not delivering the scale and quality of employment land required in order for the Borough to meet its economic needs and optimise its assets. This is an abject failing given the uncertain economic and political times ahead.

Change suggested by respondent:

To rectify matters, the Submission Draft should increase its requirement to meet local need for industry and warehousing to 44 hectares (developable, rather than gross).
In addition, the Submission Draft should make an express allowance for the large scale logistics sector. This allowance should be over and above local need and provide a minimum of a further 35 hectares.
In combination, the Submission Draft should provide and plan for at least 80 hec-tares of employment land for industry and warehousing to provide for both local need and the need for large scale logistics (i.e. big box). Without the allocation of this land, the demand for industrial and warehouse units for Solihull will be further suppressed and opportunities for economic growth, whether organic or inward in-vestment, will be missed.
This will require the release of Green Belt land and the allocation of additional new sites. We consider that the scale of need for new employment land, the reasons for its need, the emphasis placed on meeting this need in the NPPF and PPG, the increasing importance of employment in an uncertain economic outlook and the absence of other alternatives, amount to the exceptional circumstances required by the NPPF to release Green Belt land through the development plan-making process. Releases in similar circumstances have already been previously made within Solihull – Blythe Valley Business Park and Birmingham Business Park – and the wider region – i54, Peddimore and Coventry Gateway.
If it is recognised that more land is required and needs to be identified, then there should be a further consultation and/or Call for Sites. Our client, St Modwen Developments Ltd, would be pleased to provide details of a large site that is well related to a motorway junction of the M42, that is capable of meeting some of the additional need referred to above.

Full text:

Please see attached document

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14316

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Councillor Max McLoughlin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy P3 Criteria 1- the loss of Green Belt due to the amount of land made available for office space is unnecessary.

Policy P3 Criteria 3- this will open up the process of relocating waste facilities into potentially inappropriate locations.

Policy P3 Criteria 4 iii- clarity required. If a location is viable for housing, it is compatible with home-working.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14317

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Councillor Max McLoughlin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Para 143- there is only a shortfall of B8 uses. Developers will be able to submit applications for B1, B2 or B8 usage. Without protections to ensure needed development is delivered, there will be increased redundancy of older office space which isn’t suitable for repurposing as residential.

Para 145- UK2 is not in a good location and does not perform best of the potential sites as a Waste and Recycling Centre.
Para 147- if the relocation of waste facilities to the UK2 site is unsuccessful, other site options should be stated included classifications (B1, B2 etc.).

Para 150- there are no protections against land being developed for other business purposes. This has happened on the A34, with a high concentration of car dealerships.

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14372

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Prologis UK Ltd

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Supports the inclusion of this site within the table of employment site allocations under Policy P3.
The area quoted within the table should however be clarified. Although the gross area is c94 ha, that area includes substantial areas of land that are already committed/built out as well as substantial areas that will form part of the blue/green infrastructure. The actual net available area remaining is approximately 39 ha.
This also applies to Site UK1, the available employment land within that allocation is, according to the Arden Cross Masterplan, only approximately 30ha.

Based on the conclusions of the HEDNA paragraph 142 concludes that there is a shortfall of around 5.2 - 6.6 ha of employment land that the plan should provide for. The employment land need is far more extensive than the identified shortfall derived from the GL Labour Demand and past trends Modelling. There is no allowance for the past trends of JLR expansion itself (including the major LOC facility within Site UK2) or to meet the very strong regional demand for employment space, in particular for logistics warehousing, as referenced at paragraphs 12.57-12.58 of the HEDNA. That wider need is evidenced through the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study (WMSESS), part 2 of which is due to be published shortly.
Part 1 of that study however has already made clear that the M42 corridor is one of three areas within the West Midlands where there is an acute shortage of land supply set against the highest volume of demand, and that the case for allocating strategic employment sites is strong. On the back of this evidence, both Birmingham and North Warwickshire have released some Green Belt for strategic employment uses. It is evident from interim information arising from the Part 2 study that although this additional supply has come forward in recent years, the overall shortage of land remains and this situation further supports the allocation of Site UK2. We would suggest therefore that Paragraph 142 be expanded to provide a fuller picture of employment needs more clearly.

In line with these comments reference to ‘local employment’ within paragraph 145 should also be removed and just the term ‘employment’ should be used. This paragraph should also cross reference to Policy UK2. We also see no reason for reference being required to a plan-monitor-manage approach in this case or repeated Green Belt justification which is provided for elsewhere in the plan under Policy P1.

Change suggested by respondent:

Policy P3 Employment Allocations Table should be amended for Sites UK1 and UK2 to reflect the net available areas - Land at HS2 Interchange (UK1) C140 (gross) c30(net available) Land at Damson Parkway (UK2) c94 (gross) c39(net available).
Additional sentences should be added to paragraph 142:
“The HEDNA 2020 also notes that market intelligence shows a very strong demand for warehousing and industrial units across the spectrum which is concentrated along the M42 corridor and forecasts point to a clear need for additional warehousing. This is likely to be reinforced by the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study Part 2. Previous Regional Studies which have consistently shown a shortage of land for strategic employment sites across the West Midlands, with the M42 corridor in particular being an area that has historically had a high volume of demand but a constrained supply. The inclusion of site UK2 can therefore also help towards meeting this wider regional strategic land requirement.”
Paragraph 145 should be amended as follows:

“The above table also includes two allocations (Sites UK1 & UK2) which will necessitate land to be removed from the Green Belt. The justification for Policy P1 provides the exceptional circumstances for this approach. Whilst Site UK2 is partly intended to provide for JLR needs, much of this has already been committed in the form of the despatch area and logistics operations centre, approved under very special circumstances. The concept masterplan shows the development areas that are already committed and constructed and a number of phases remaining for development, which can meet wider general local employment needs together with that required to meet any additional needs of JLR and JLR related activities and ancillary development to Birmingham Airport as set out in Policy UK2. The site can also accommodate a potential replacement Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Depot subject to ongoing options assessment by the Council as set out in Policy P12., Evidence indicates that Site UK1 is likely to have a role to play in meeting local employment needs, especially later in the Plan period.”

Full text:

See attachments

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 14671

Received: 10/12/2020

Respondent: Association of Black Country Authorities (ABCA)

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Plan has made no contribution to the Black Country in respect of employment land. The reasoning behind the lack of a contribution to meeting employment land needs arising in the Black Country, equivalent to housing needs, is unclear, and at this stage this represents a failure to meet the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate.

Full text:

See Attached Document

Attachments:

Object

Solihull Local Plan (Draft Submission) 2020

Representation ID: 15244

Received: 14/12/2020

Respondent: Stoford Developments

Agent: Delta Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Supports the inclusion of this site within the table of employment site allocations under Policy P3.
The area quoted within the table should however be clarified. Although the gross area is c94 ha, that area includes substantial areas of land that are already committed/built out as well as substantial areas that will form part of the blue/green infrastructure. The actual net available area remaining is approximately 39 ha.
This also applies to Site UK1, the available employment land within that allocation is, according to the Arden Cross Masterplan, only approximately 30ha.

Based on the conclusions of the HEDNA paragraph 142 concludes that there is a shortfall of around 5.2 - 6.6 ha of employment land that the plan should provide for. The employment land need is far more extensive than the identified shortfall derived from the GL Labour Demand and past trends Modelling. There is no allowance for the past trends of JLR expansion itself (including the major LOC facility within Site UK2) or to meet the very strong regional demand for employment space, in particular for logistics warehousing, as referenced at paragraphs 12.57-12.58 of the HEDNA. That wider need is evidenced through the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study (WMSESS), part 2 of which is due to be published shortly.
Part 1 of that study however has already made clear that the M42 corridor is one of three areas within the West Midlands where there is an acute shortage of land supply set against the highest volume of demand, and that the case for allocating strategic employment sites is strong. On the back of this evidence, both Birmingham and North Warwickshire have released some Green Belt for strategic employment uses. It is evident from interim information arising from the Part 2 study that although this additional supply has come forward in recent years, the overall shortage of land remains and this situation further supports the allocation of Site UK2. We would suggest therefore that Paragraph 142 be expanded to provide a fuller picture of employment needs more clearly.

In line with these comments reference to ‘local employment’ within paragraph 145 should also be removed and just the term ‘employment’ should be used. This paragraph should also cross reference to Policy UK2. We also see no reason for reference being required to a plan-monitor-manage approach in this case or repeated Green Belt justification which is provided for elsewhere in the plan under Policy P1.

Change suggested by respondent:

Policy P3 Employment Allocations Table should be amended for Sites UK1 and UK2 to reflect the net available areas - Land at HS2 Interchange (UK1) C140 (gross) c30(net available) Land at Damson Parkway (UK2) c94 (gross) c39(net available).
Additional sentences should be added to paragraph 142:
“The HEDNA 2020 also notes that market intelligence shows a very strong demand for warehousing and industrial units across the spectrum which is concentrated along the M42 corridor and forecasts point to a clear need for additional warehousing. This is likely to be reinforced by the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study Part 2. Previous Regional Studies which have consistently shown a shortage of land for strategic employment sites across the West Midlands, with the M42 corridor in particular being an area that has historically had a high volume of demand but a constrained supply. The inclusion of site UK2 can therefore also help towards meeting this wider regional strategic land requirement.”
Paragraph 145 should be amended as follows:

“The above table also includes two allocations (Sites UK1 & UK2) which will necessitate land to be removed from the Green Belt. The justification for Policy P1 provides the exceptional circumstances for this approach. Whilst Site UK2 is partly intended to provide for JLR needs, much of this has already been committed in the form of the despatch area and logistics operations centre, approved under very special circumstances. The concept masterplan shows the development areas that are already committed and constructed and a number of phases remaining for development, which can meet wider general local employment needs together with that required to meet any additional needs of JLR and JLR related activities and ancillary development to Birmingham Airport as set out in Policy UK2. The site can also accommodate a potential replacement Household Waste and Recycling Centre and Depot subject to ongoing options assessment by the Council as set out in Policy P12., Evidence indicates that Site UK1 is likely to have a role to play in meeting local employment needs, especially later in the Plan period.”

Full text:

See attachments