Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6002
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Ronald A Smith
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6005
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Darren Abreu
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6008
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr P Phillips
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6011
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs P Phillips
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6014
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs L Keene
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6017
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Pam Marsden
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6020
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Rita Perks
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6023
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr H Keene
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6026
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Frost
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6029
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr G Frost
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6032
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs J A Gledhill
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6035
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Clifford Gledhill
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6038
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs E A Seal
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6041
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs H Brookes
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6044
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Surinder Teja
The phasing of any development in Balsall Common must recognise the impact and disruption of HS2.
see letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6054
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Solihull Ratepayers Association
Green Belt around Sites 4, 11, 12 and 13 is too narrow and vulnerable to coalescence between settlements.
Require more qualitative assessment of Green Belt.
Refer to statements on Green Belt in Housing White Paper consultation.
Necessary technical assessments, especially for connectivity and
facilities are not currently available. These are needed to comment on the infrastructure requirements to ensure the proposed sites are deliverable and will not cause undue harm.
petition submitted by Solihull Ratepayers - 34 pages containing 361 signatures
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6057
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Study Mapping -
Should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6066
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Topic Papers - Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6068
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6069
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6076
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
In relation to SHELAA Site 209:
Misleading assessment of site in SHELAA report with regard to availability, achievability and suitability;
Site performs less well in terms of combined Green Belt score with 4 out of 12.
LCA covers too broad an area.
Inaccurate accessibility mapping scores;
Misleading interim sustainability assessment.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6077
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
DLP fails to meet NPPF requirements for Duty-to-Cooperate:
Much of necessary evidence has not been completed (contrary to Para. 182).
None of evidence available at Cabinet meeting when Members supported consultation.
Evidence includes numerous inaccuracies.
Evidence difficult to interpret as different numbering systems and boundaries.
Official evidence published after 5th December on website.
Calls into question how robust site choices were made.
Representors unable to make fully informed comments.
Interim SA looks at larger area and not SHELAA Site 209 in particular.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6078
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Lack of options to give local communities involvement and choice when considering potential housing sites, contrary to NPPF and neighbourhood planning.
Proposed strategy will result in over-dependence on large housebuilders.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6079
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6080
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6089
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Mapping should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6099
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Site Selection Topic Papers: Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6106
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
In relation to evidence on SHELAA Site 19:
SHELAA rates site as Category 1 and we agree.
Should not be included in overall Broad Area assessment for Green Belt purposes.
Disagree with Landscape Character Area assessment regarding this site.
Accessibility can change over time.
Not included in interim sustainability assessment.
Should be included in SA.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6107
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
DLP fails to meet NPPF requirements for Duty-to-Cooperate:
Much of necessary evidence has not been completed (contrary to Para. 182).
None of evidence available at Cabinet meeting when Members supported consultation.
Evidence includes numerous inaccuracies.
Evidence difficult to interpret as different numbering systems and boundaries.
Official evidence published after 5th December on website.
Calls into question how robust site choices were made.
Representors unable to make fully informed comments.
Interim SA does not include assessment of SHELAA Site 19 as a Rural Exception Site.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6108
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Lack of options to give local communities involvement and choice when considering potential housing sites, contrary to NPPF and neighbourhood planning.
Proposed strategy will result in over-dependence on large housebuilders.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.