Q23. Are there any other comments you wish to make on the Draft Local Plan?
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6109
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6110
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6124
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Mapping:
Should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6134
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Site Selection Topic Papers - Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6142
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
In relation to SHELAA Site 1017:
Misleading assessment of site in SHELAA report;
Inaccurate accessibility mapping scores;
Green Belt scores should be assessed for site itself and not wider area.
Misleading interpretation of Landscape Character Assessment.
Misleading interim sustainability assessment.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6143
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
DLP fails to meet NPPF requirements for Duty-to-Cooperate:
Much of necessary evidence has not been completed (contrary to Para. 182).
None of evidence available at Cabinet meeting when Members supported consultation.
Evidence includes numerous inaccuracies.
Evidence difficult to interpret as different numbering systems and boundaries.
Official evidence published after 5th December on website.
Calls into question how robust site choices were made.
Representors unable to make fully informed comments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6144
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Lack of options to give local communities involvement and choice when considering potential housing sites, contrary to NPPF and neighbourhood planning.
Proposed strategy will result in over-dependence on large housebuilders.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6145
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6146
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6155
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Mapping:
Should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6165
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Land Balsall Common
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Site Selection Topic Papers- Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review on behalf of the landowners at the sites at Wootton Green Lane, Balsall Common.
The submission comprises
* the letter of representations (10607 LPA2 JD LPR APP);
* Site plan (10607(OS)01) with the site edged red;
* Illustrative layout (10607(MP)01);
* Transport Assessment prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering; and
* Landscape character assessment response prepared by Landscape Matters
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6172
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
In relation to SHELAA Sites 16 and 17:
Support SHELAA report ranking of Category 1 for both of the sites, and comment that sites could be appropriate for residential use and make an appropriate extension to the existing settlement;
Accessibility mapping scores could be improved if sites merged with proposed allocation 16;
Support GBA score.
Landscape Character Assessment is more favourable than some of proposed housing allocations.
Not included in interim sustainability assessment.
Site should be included in SA.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6173
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
DLP fails to meet NPPF requirements for Duty-to-Cooperate:
Much of necessary evidence has not been completed (contrary to Para. 182).
None of evidence available at Cabinet meeting when Members supported consultation.
Evidence includes numerous inaccuracies.
Evidence difficult to interpret as different numbering systems and boundaries.
Official evidence published after 5th December on website.
Calls into question how robust site choices were made.
Representors unable to make fully informed comments.
SHELAA Sites 16 and 17 omitted from Interim SA.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6174
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Lack of options to give local communities involvement and choice when considering potential housing sites, contrary to NPPF and neighbourhood planning.
Proposed strategy will result in over-dependence on large housebuilders.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6175
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6176
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6185
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Mapping:
Should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6195
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: the Client
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Site Selection Topic Papers- Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land south of Hampton Lane, and west of Ravenshaw Lane/ South of Hampton Lane, Solihull.
The submission comprises the letter of representations (9263 SHL LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 9263 Site Plan) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6204
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
In relation to reduced portion of SHELAA Site 64:
Misleading assessment of site in SHELAA report;
Inaccurate and misleading accessibility mapping scores;
Misleading interpretation of site in GBA.
Misleading interpretation of site in Landscape Character Assessment.
Not included in interim sustainability assessment for consideration as Rural Exception Site. Should be included in SA.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6205
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
DLP fails to meet NPPF requirements for Duty-to-Cooperate:
Much of necessary evidence has not been completed (contrary to Para. 182).
None of evidence available at Cabinet meeting when Members supported consultation.
Evidence includes numerous inaccuracies.
Evidence difficult to interpret as different numbering systems and boundaries.
Official evidence published after 5th December on website.
Calls into question how robust site choices were made.
Representors unable to make fully informed comments.
SHELAA Site 64 omitted from Interim SA.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6206
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Lack of options to give local communities involvement and choice when considering potential housing sites, contrary to NPPF and neighbourhood planning.
Proposed strategy will result in over-dependence on large housebuilders.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6207
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Proportionate evidence not been provided in support of Council's proposed housing allocations or to justify the rejection of other sites which perform equally well.
Much of the submitted evidence is subject to challenge due to omission of sites within reports and mistakes made during site assessments.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6208
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Many of rejected sites from SHELAA:
Do not have existing viable community or recreational facilities,
Moderate to low value to the purposes of including land within the Green Belt,
Relatively sustainable,
Less landscape impact,
Partly brownfield/previously developed land,
Perform better when judged against Council's guiding principles (p.35 of DLP).
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6211
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Council not provided the public with necessary annual monitoring information for an objective assessment to be made of the success of the affordable housing policy, including the effectiveness of the Rural Exception Sites policy.
Localism Act requires Councils to publish this information direct to the public annually in the interests of transparency.
Should form critical evidence feeding into the DLP.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6222
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Accessibility Mapping:
Should be corrected to include an assessment of sites 153 & 154, forming part of proposed Site 9, currently omitted from the appraisal.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6232
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cosmic Fireworks Directors Retirement Fund
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Site Selection Topic Papers- Brief overview of officer views on where it is appropriate to direct development does not make detailed reference to evidence material and it does not provide information specific to sites selected for allocation compared to those site areas rejected.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the land at Barston Lane/ Oak Lane, Barston B92 0JR
The submission comprises the letter of representations (10445 LA3 GC LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 10445-01A) with the site edged red.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6237
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Stoford Properties
Agent: Barton Willmore
Employment Land Review:
Should have assessed Birmingham's demand, supply and suitability of locations to mee tthe demand for employmen tland.
Consequently we feel that the ELR has underestimated the need for employment land on both a local and wider West Midlands context.
We would like to submit a formal response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan Review Consultation on behalf of Stoford Properties. As part of our response, please find attached our Representations Letter.
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6254
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Packington Estate Enterprises Ltd
Potential expansion of Birmingham Airport to east of A452:
Would prefer a second runway to utilise Site 20.
Expansion to East would further jeopardise the Green Belt, the River Blythe SSSI and ornithological flyway, Packington Hall (Grade II* listed) and the listed Capability Brown Park, along with having to move circa 30 million tonnes of domestic waste at Packington Landfill.
Note:
No national policy supporting a second runway
No prepared economic business or environmental case in public domain
No coherent plan for removal of 30M tonnes of waste
Removal of 1000s of trees
Increased noise impacts
Water management in area.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6276
Received: 13/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Judith Thomas
When designing the infrastructure plan, it should be acknowledged that Balsall Common will already be extensively impacted by HS2 construction works in the period 2018 to 2026. This needs to be considered when designing infrastructure plans and phasing of development build. As a minimum there should be no commencement of any development work on Site 1 until such time as the HS2 works are completed.
Given the major impact on local infrastructure, all monies received by SMBC from the development should be reserved solely for use in the locality impacted by the development. When designing the infrastructure plan, it should be acknowledged that Balsall Common will already be extensively impacted by HS2 construction works in the period 2018 to 2026. This needs to be considered when designing infrastructure plans and phasing of development build. As a minimum there should be no commencement of any Barratts Farm development work until such time as the HS2 works are completed
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6281
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Federated Scrap Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb Planning Consultancy
Tests of soundness:
Not positively prepared - does not meet objectively assessed housing needs for the HMA. Solihull needs to contribute to the overspill to ensure sustainable development can take place and to support the region's economy.
Green Belt review should release land for future plan periods up to 2050.
Not justified - does not test reasonable alternative as it does not meet the housing requirements of the wider HMA.
Not effective - does not meet cross boundary objectives since it fails to fulfil the uptodate objectively assessed needs of HMA.
Not consistent with national policy - inadequate housing provision.
submission by agent on behalf Federated Scrap and proposal land at Jacobean Lane Copt Heath