09 Knowle - South of Knowle
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5064
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Gavin Perkins
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 houses with reasonable garden space in keeping with character of local area.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5066
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Linda Page
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses so that there is space for houses within rural setting.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5067
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Bernadette Pekins
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5068
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: T Phillips
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5069
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr T Pritchard
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses and consideration of access as all traffic will go through village.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5070
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Bernadette Pruden
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses unless roads are widened, extra parking provided in Knowle centre and additional health care facilities provided. May need additional parking for new school as further to walk for many children.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5071
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Claire Perkins
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5072
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Lauren Reilly
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5085
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Ellie Rylah
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5086
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Lynne & Gordon Ramsay
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. Anymore than 500 would have a detrimental effect on the local area. Significant development would require major investment in the area's infrastructure including, but not limited to school places, school premises and health care provision.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5087
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: C Rose
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5088
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Dr Paul Rylah
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5089
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Emma Sibbing
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5090
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Gemma Small
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. Over 500 would be too crowded.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5091
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Joe Stanway
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built. The number of houses should be however many will fit in liveable conditions with enough space. Also there should be new green space there.
See attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5092
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Matt Stephens
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5093
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Charlie Smith
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5094
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Jane Starling
Reluctantly agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built. Against the taking of more Green Belt but if this is mostly achieved by land swap, I would not protest, subject to infrastructure issues being addressed. Concerned about all the areas within the triangle marked for future development. Knowle may need a new school, but not at the expense of turning the village into an urban sprawl and losing the village feel. We don't need 1000 houses.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5095
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: B Swales
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. I agree that the money needed by selling land for homes should go towards a new school but am concerned that the land identified for the new school appears smaller than the current site and is locked by other developments.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5096
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Nick Spence
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. I believe it would benefit the area to build on this site and to ensure that with more houses that more affordable housing is created in the area because of this. Something that I think is currently lacking and would benefit from massively.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5098
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: David Tait
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.
See Attachment
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5100
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Lucy Slaney
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. Too many houses could cause over-population.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5101
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Louise Smith
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. Too many houses could cause over-population.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5102
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: West Santisook
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site. Provide as many houses for the community as possible.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5299
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Daron Gay
Agent: Richard Cobb Planning
While there may be reasons behind Site 9 in terms of replacing the present Arden School buildings, that is no reason to destroy the countryside to the east of Knowle to the extent proposed.
see attached letter
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5518
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Hulse
Housing allocations in Knowle go far beyond what current infrastructure can cope with, which will increase congestion and pollution through High Street and threaten damage to historic buildings, result in green belt being lost and destroy nature of area and village, do not reflect vision of spreading development across Knowle, Dorridge and Bentley Heath, densities proposed likely to lead to traffic problems and issues relating to lack of storage areas for cars/cycles/recycling and green space.
Dear Sirs,
The local plan has major flaw- the new infrastructure and economic activity centres (UK central and HS2 hub) are in the north-east of the borough and the majority of the development is sited in the south of the borough. This means that the workforce for the new economic areas will be crossing the borough on a regular basis. There are no plans for new infrastructure to link the housing to the economic activity areas, the roads, in particular the M42 and the A4141 are already at capacity at peak periods. It would be better to site the housing near to the economic activity areas.
The housing development allocations in Knowle go far beyond what the current infrastructure can cope with. your stated objective is to retain the historic core of the village. With the increased traffic having no alternative but to cross the village through the High St, this will become constantly clogged with traffic, which will increase pollution and could lead to damage to fragile foundations of the historic buildings. If this plan is accepted the green belt will be lost, but as important a 20% increase in the number of homes in the area will destroy the nature of the area and the village of Knowle as we know it.
The vision states that the developments will be in Dorridge, Bentley Heath and Knowle. The plan shows only development in Knowle and the majority of traffic leaving the development with be going North to Solihull on the A4141 in Knowle.
The plan shows housing at a density which has recently been achieved in 2 new developments in Knowle. The experience of this density is that there are traffic problems, no suitable locations for recycling storage, little green space. One only has to look back but a few years to see that overcrowded developments become the substandard housing of the future. If due to lack of space people find it difficult to keep the area tidy (dustbins in the road etc, no where to store a bike, no where to keep equipment for maintaining the exterior) work will not be done and the area will become unpleasant for the majority.
We are not a London Borough where public transport links mean a car is not necessary. Current bike routes end at the most dangerous points, at junctions or roundabouts and it is therefore unrealistic to bank on the prospect of people managing in our areas without a car. Developments will need space for cars and people.
Your vision for expansion of the Town centre does not take into account the expectation that shopping in the high street will decline over the next 20 years. An extension to Touchwood is not needed, and if built, will further destroy the character of Solihull.
Yours faithfully
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5548
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
The site will destroy the character and setting of Knowle. It will massively impact on the visual aspect of Knowle from the east. The allocation should not extend to the Warwick Road or beyond the Middlefield development. The remaining balance of numbers can be found by adopting a dispersal approach using smaller or medium sized sites.
Please find attached my own general comments on the Draft Local Plan
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5854
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: P Benton & T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 site. Comments that comprehensive masterplan is proposed. 10-24% of site is in LWS.
GBA - Combined score of 5. Should be increased to 6 and 7 as close to other settlements.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Site includes over 20ha of high quality agricultural land, ecological interest, close to noise sources, visually prominent setting.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions recently.
Undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at and to the rear of 146- 152 Tilehouse Lane, Whitlock's End, B90 1PW.
The submission comprises the
* letter of representations (10463 HRW LPR APP);
* a site plan (ref.no. 10463-01A) with the site edged red;
* an Illustrative layout (10463(10)M-101 prepared by Tyler-Parkes Partnership
* a Transport Statement prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering Ltd
* An updated Extended Phase I Habitat Survey prepared by Cotswold Wildlife Surveys
* Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by BWB
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6087
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tidbury Green Golf Club
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 site. Comments that comprehensive masterplan is proposed. 10-24% of site is in LWS.
GBA - Combined score of 5. Should be increased to 6 and 7 as close to other settlements.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Site includes over 20ha of high quality agricultural land, ecological interest, close to noise sources, visually prominent setting.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions recently.
Undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for the site at Tidbury Green Golf Club, Tidbury Green.
The submission comprises
* The letter of representations (10171 LPA3 LPR APP)
* An existing site plan (ref.no. 10509(EX)01) with the site edged red.
* Schedule of accommodation (10509(SC)01)
* Illustrative Site Layout (10509(MP)01)
* Ecological Appraisal prepared by Crossman Associates
* Environmental Noise Report prepared by Sharps Redmore
* Flood Risk Assessment prepared by THDA
* Tree Survey prepared by Abbey Forestry
* Transport Statement and Travel Plan prepared by ADL Traffic Engineering
* Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by Landscape Matters
* Site Investigation Report prepared by Georisk UK
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 6122
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs A Curtis
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Review of evidence:
SHELAA - Category 1 site. Comments that comprehensive masterplan is proposed. 10-24% of site is in LWS.
GBA - Combined score of 5. Should be increased to 6 and 7 as close to other settlements.
LCA - Considered a 'low' capacity to accommodate change.
Interim SA - Site includes over 20ha of high quality agricultural land, ecological interest, close to noise sources, visually prominent setting.
Removal from Green Belt not justified by NPPF.
Arden Academy has undergone a significant number of upgrades and extensions recently.
Undermines need and cost justification of brand new secondary school.
Please find attached representations to the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review for land at the rear of Bakehouse Lane and Wheeler Close, Chadwick End
The submission comprises the letter of representations (6439.LPA1.HMG LPR APP) and a site plan (ref.no. 6439 site plan) with the site edged red.