09 Knowle - South of Knowle

No

Representation ID: 4781

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Michael Swann

Object to development of Site 9 as less than 500 houses should be built.

No

Representation ID: 4782

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Dr Linda Parsons

Site 9 Objection

No

Representation ID: 4783

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: mr Robert Powell

Object to development of Site 9 as green belt land, requires new/larger school, and road infrastructure is at times unable to cope with existing volume of traffic without an additional 2000 vehicles.

No

Representation ID: 4784

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: K Price Feraid

Object to development of Site 9 as current infrastructure is inadequate for number of houses proposed which should be reduced to less than 500, the school does not need to be rebuilt as already fit for purpose and able to maintain current high standards, green field land/green spaces and Solihull MIND site should be protected

No

Representation ID: 4785

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jonathan Stott

Object to development of Site 9 as area has unique charm that is being ruined by continued development, there are already numerous schemes including affordable housing which will reduce desirability of area, and provision of further facilities at Arden school should not be at expense of further housing estates.

No

Representation ID: 4786

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: H Vaughton

Object to development of Site 9 as Knowle has suffered from estates being built since 1970s, and is already far too busy with parking a nightmare.

No

Representation ID: 4787

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Darion Walters

Object to development of Site 9 as should be restricted to less than 500 houses, and have serious reservations about the new school being located adjacent the Solihull Mental Health Trust's facilities.

No

Representation ID: 4788

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Patrick Wells

Site 9 Objection

No

Representation ID: 4789

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: E Whitehill

Object to development of Site 9 as the principle of building new houses to support a new school required because of additional housing is farcical and involvement of developer suggests a deal has been done.

No

Representation ID: 4813

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Peter Whitfield

Object to development of Site 9 as there is adequate space on existing site to develop school, inadequate infrastructure in Knowle to support proposed housing and more needs to be done to address access and congestion or numbers reduced, no justification provided for loss of green belt and alternative options should be considered to protect green belt, no adequate environmental protection in place, and impact on wider community will not be compensated by any additional facilities on relatively small site.

No

Representation ID: 4817

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jane Watts

Site 9 Objection

Yes

Representation ID: 4819

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Rachel Caswell

Site 9 Objection

Yes

Representation ID: 4820

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Fazle Chowdhury

Support development of Site 9 as will help to address housing crisis and existing school is inadequate to meet future needs of students in terms of space and facilities.

Yes

Representation ID: 4821

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Peter & Penny Coggan

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 houses as more would drastically alter character of Knowle, overload infrastructure and constitute significant overdevelopment, and provision of a range of house types and affordable housing.

Yes

Representation ID: 4835

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Kler Group - Gentleshaw Lane

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Support the site allocation. It is a lower performing area of Green Belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 4840

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jayne Craven

Support development of Site 9 subject to less than 500 dwellings.

Yes

Representation ID: 4851

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Emma Chee

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 houses as infrastructure will not cope with more due to road congestion, demands on train services, shopping and community facilities, and primary school places.

Yes

Representation ID: 4864

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Alan Chandler

Agree that site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4890

Received: 17/03/2017

Respondent: Persons with an interest Site 9

Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd

Support. It is a lower performing area of Green Belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 4901

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: G Cantone

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Providing there are detached / semi-detached and large enough for a family, as many as will fit on the land should be built.
This is a rare opportunity that should be taken for the benefit of the school and the local area.

No

Representation ID: 4903

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Theresa Dacombe

Don't know whether agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built. But under 500 houses should be built on this site.
The roads in Knowle and Dorridge are already congested and Station Road currently is quite dangerous when Arden School comes out.

Yes

Representation ID: 4904

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: D Le Saint

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Can't comment on the number of houses that should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4905

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Steven Dugmore

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4906

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Martin Dedicoat

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4907

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Katie Davie

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. It shouldn't be too overcrowded.
Originally I was against the idea, thinking it was unnecessary, a waste of money. However, with more information provided it sounds like a very ambitious and exciting plan.

Yes

Representation ID: 4908

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Nicola Dugmore

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4909

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Harriet Endley

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site. If this was exceeded I would be worried about the detrimental effect on local amenities and on traffic, parking and house prices.
Question whether the school would be able to cater for all the children in the local area and if not, where would they go.
Lots of flats/apartments would add diversity to the population of the area. This could be viewed positively or negatively and needs further consideration.

Yes

Representation ID: 4912

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Rebecca England

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4913

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: D Enticott

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 4914

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Zaki Fergusson

Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.