09 Knowle - South of Knowle
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4993
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Alex King
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4995
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Tim Knight
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
The local infrastructure is struggling to cope as it is. The roads will not cope, given the location of the housing with more than the initial 350 units planned.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 4999
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Ruth Kirby
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5002
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Ashdone Khan
Unsure about site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Over 500 houses should be built on this site.
Smaller, cost effective and affordable for younger / first time buyers
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5004
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs S Larkin
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
Under 500 houses should be built on this site.
A too large development would have a negative impact on local traffic as well as services. The developers need to be required to consider sustainability, active travel and provision of green spaces and play areas. The houses built should include bike storage, utilise solar energy where possible and the whole area needs to be designated a 20mph zone.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5006
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mary Ing
Agree with site 9 being developed for housing that would enable a new secondary school to be built.
500 houses should be built on this site.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5008
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Nick Williams
Support development of site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses and consideration of other infrastructure needs such as medical services, parking and shopping facilities.
Arden Academy Questionaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5009
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: James Lethbridge
Support development of Site 9 subject to diverse types including affordable family homes and social housing, and good non-car based transport links, with cycle ways and walking routes enabling safe access to school and providing leisure routes.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5010
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Bill Lord
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 houses, avoidance of over-development and equal provision of infrastructure.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5011
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Antoinette Morgan
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses, more information on impact on wider community as village centres, centre and station car parks cannot accommodate current population and do not wish to see upheaval for medical practice.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5012
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Martin Murphy
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built as good for the community.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5044
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Patrick Taylor
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5045
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr M Trentham
Support Site 9 the Arden Triangle, because it has ideal and totally defensible boundaries. It can provide not only the replacement Arden Academy, but a new public park, a final solution to the unsatisfactory Rotten Row junctions, and a new section of Grove Road, to improve traffic flows to Dorridge and Bentley Heath.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5046
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Cliff Topham Steele
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses, and improvements to local infrastructure based on transport study and incorporating bypass with high quality, safe footways, cycle paths and crossings, funded by developers.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5047
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Craig Vincent
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5048
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Daniel Walker
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
No
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5049
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jodie Lee Wilson
Too many houses proposed which will result in additional traffic when current position is already bad especially at peak times, and will result in loss of recently developed buildings at Arden school. School should focus on parking facilities, escalator provision, IT equipment and larger canteen.
Arden Academy questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5050
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs C Watt
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to limit to 450 houses.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5051
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: A Whitfield
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to maximum of 500 houses as infrastructure could not cope with more.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5052
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Siobhan Williams
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses. Should include relocation of St George & St Teresa primary school, as need to increase primary school facilities for new housing proposals, and St George and St Teresa school has been unable to expand and is forced to exclude children in parish and with siblings at school, with its catchment going beyond Knowle/Dorridge, which should be addressed.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Plus email:
In response to the Draft Local Plan Review I would like to make two comments:
1. I want to highlight the need to take advantage of once in a lifetime opportunity to create a decent new, fit for purpose, secondary school (a relocated Arden Academy) with appropriate facilities and accommodation plus the significant benefits for the community in terms of potential facilities such as a swimming pool, theatre, youth club etc, which benefit beyond the school and to the whole community.
I do not feel that the KDBH response to the planning proposal for site 9 is reflective at all of many people's support for the new school proposal.
However, I think 750 houses is too much when my understanding was that 450 were required to fund the new school and facilities, which is still a considerable amount of additional housing.
2. There is also a need for an increase in primary education, as proposed in Items 4, 8 and 9.
This directly impacts on the education of my children at St George & St Teresa RC School and I request this to be considered in the planning of this provision going forward.
During recent years local development has been substantial and whilst Local Authority School in the area have been increased to meet demand St George & St Teresa has not.
The school site and building is not fit for purpose and cannot meet demand for places. It is unsustainable to have a one form entry school with modern funding and curriculum requirements and if the school is not supported to expand it will struggle, ultimately to the detriment if the whole community.
Currently , the school is oversubscribed and with additional housing in its catchment (including beyond Dorridge, Knowle and Bentley Heath, the school has been forced to exclude children in parish, catchment and with siblings in our school which is an unacceptable burden on the human right to family life.
The size of our catchment area to include new developments at Balsall Common, Hockley Heath
and additional potential impact from Blythe Valley, as well as Knowle & Dorridge demonstrates
a need which should be addressed.
The ideal location for a new two form St George and St Teresa school would be on site 9 as more playground space would be available, compared with the very cramped current site which I believe is already too small for the number of children attending the school and it would be inappropriate to increase the school to 2 form entry without extending the grounds.
This is especially so compared to the extremely generous grounds occupied by Dorridge Infant and Junior School, the top parts of the field which adjoin St George and St Teresa's are never used and surplus to Dorridge school's requirements.
So, as an alternative, a proportion of Dorridge school's ground, currently assigned (and under occupied by Dorridge school) could be reallocated to St George and St Teresa's for new development.
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5053
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jack Macey
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5054
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Thomas Macey
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built with better facilities.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5055
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Jean Moon
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses as educational provision in sufficient for greater number.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5056
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Tony Moon
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built providing facilities for housing numbers managed.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5057
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Claire Mitchell
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses, as too many will put additional strain on already oversubscribed medical, educational, shopping, parking and green space facilities.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5058
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Ian Moseley
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, but should not be high density, be in keeping with surrounding area and not exclusive gated developments.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5059
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Janice Murphy
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5060
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Margaret Murphy
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to densities in line with Four Ashes development.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5061
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Ann O'Reilly
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to addressing infrastructure concerns.
Arden Academy Questionnaire
Yes
Draft Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 5062
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: S Olsen
Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses as major concerns about increasing population by too much and impact on traffic levels.
Arden Academy Questionnaire