09 Knowle - South of Knowle

Yes

Representation ID: 4467

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs D & K Tomkins

Support Arden Triangle site. Lower impact of a small number of large developments than a large number of small developments. Provision of local infrastructure in the locality of the development.

Yes

Representation ID: 4478

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T & L Baines

Support Arden Triangle site. Lower impact of a small number of large developments than a large number of small developments. Provision of local infrastructure in the locality of the development.

Yes

Representation ID: 4484

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R & B Ethell

Support Arden Triangle site. Lower impact of a small number of large developments than a large number of small developments. Provision of local infrastructure in the locality of the development.

Yes

Representation ID: 4489

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs N & L Treadwell

Support Arden Triangle site. Lower impact of a small number of large developments than a large number of small developments. Provision of local infrastructure in the locality of the development.

No

Representation ID: 4600

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Chris Abberley

see questionnaire

No

Representation ID: 4603

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Liz Bernard

As received from Arden Academy - Partial printout.

Disagree with Site 9 being developed.
Continue to improve facilities at the existing Arden school.
Fail to understand how local authority is allowed to spend millions on Arden over 6 years and think it's ok to pull down a perfectly adequate school to make a few pounds and try and disguise it as a benefit to our community.

No

Representation ID: 4604

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Morris Arnold

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing.
Loss of Green Belt.
Should use brownfield sites first.
Infrastructure needs to be sorted first, car parking, primary schools, doctor surgeries.
Solihull must not become a Birmingham overspill area.

No

Representation ID: 4605

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs C M Arnold

Disagree with new housing on school.
Present infrastructure unable to cope.
Disregard for Government's stated intention that brownfield sites should be developed first.

No

Representation ID: 4606

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Chris Batiste

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing.
Will cause increase in traffic through Knowle.
Medical services oversubscribed.
Added pollution from extra 500 cars.

Yes

Representation ID: 4607

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: E Bennett

Agree to houses being built on Site 9.
Under 500 homes should be built.
Would rather provide outdoor social and play areas than tightly packed with properties.
Would like to see following community facilities built:
Swimming pool
leisure centre/gym
outdoor pitches/astro turf for hire, with flood lights.
Youth club.

Access to such facilities would be economically attractive to residents.
Agree we need more housing, especially affordable, to include some social housing.

No

Representation ID: 4610

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Robert Blackadder

Disagree with houses being built on Site 9.
Developing more houses is not the only way of funding the appropriate provision and improvement of school facilities in the village.
Oppose new school; facilities promoted in Arden's 2020 vision are overambitious and disproportionate.
School's current position is due to piecemeal development on the site. Most sustainable solution is to redevelop on site in a modular programme.

No

Representation ID: 4611

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Deniz Barczak

Disagree with new housing on Site 9 to enable a new secondary school.
Under 500 homes should be built.
Would like to see following community facilities at new school:
Swimming pool,
Gymnasium,
Tennis court,
Bigger library.

No

Representation ID: 4614

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Linda Burroughs

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing.
School is perfectly adequate as it stands, and a great deal of funds have been invested already.
Not necessary for community facilities to be built at school as all are available close by in Solihull and Warwick.
Will add to congestion.

No

Representation ID: 4631

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Joe Craven

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing to enable a new secondary school.
Under 500 homes should be built.
Would like to see following community facilities at new school:
Theatre,
Gym.

No

Representation ID: 4633

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Paul Eden

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing as set out in current plan.
Under 500 homes should be built on site.
Scale of housing is too large, and too onerous a trade off for the new school.
My view would change if plans revised.
Would like to see following community facilities at new school:
Gym,
Pool.
Current plans would change character of village.

No

Representation ID: 4635

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Guy Fathers

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing.
Better to improve the existing than build new.
Knowle is a small village, close to Solihull and Birmingham that have fantastic facilities.
Knowle already a busy, bustling village. Concerned about added traffic and demand on services and space.

No

Representation ID: 4636

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Charlotte Floate

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing to enable a new secondary school.
Under 500 homes should be built.
Village already changing into size of a town.
Infrastructure already struggling.
Would like to see following community facilities at new school:
Business school,
Technology suite,
Outdoor sports facilities.
Current school already has lots of facilites.
Investment already made would be wasted.
Size of current school is large enough.
Disagree with taking children in from outside the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 4637

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Elizabeth Adam

Support development of housing Site 9 to enable new secondary school but should be restricted to less than 500 dwellings.

Yes

Representation ID: 4643

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: E Atkins

Support housing on Site 9 in principle to enable new secondary school subject to roads, road safety, parking and new medical provision being high on Council's list of priorities.

No

Representation ID: 4646

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Simon Gates

Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing to enable new secondary school.
Over 500 houses should be built on site.
Would like to see following community facilities at new school:
Swimming pool,
Theatre/arts centre.

No

Representation ID: 4650

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Roger Cook

In response to Arden Questionnaire:
Disagree with Site 9 being developed for housing to enable a new secondary school.
No houses should be built there as Green Belt.
Knowle village cannot sustain 1000 dwellings. Infrastructure can't cope, other locations to build in Borough.
Residents of Knowle should not have to 'pay' for failure of school to keep up with current standards.
Sajid Javid is shelving plans to build on Green Belt.
Landowner will only provide land for playing field.
£30M revenue for housing is questionable; 450 houses at £200K only amounts to £90M. 1/3 of profit lost.

Yes

Representation ID: 4657

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Harpreet Atwal

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.

No

Representation ID: 4661

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Estelle Palmer

- A view is emerging that a new school could be of benefit to the community but the price to pay for those benefits in terms of the consequential impacts on infrastructure, landscape, and access to countryside that would result from 750 houses is unnecessarily high.
- too many basic questions being left unanswered for the NF to reach a view on what a reasonable reduced housing number might be.
- site is poor in accessibility terms and represents an unacceptable location for new housing development.

Yes

Representation ID: 4665

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Shelia Andrews

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built providing less than 500 dwellings and the preservation of the land occupied by Solihull MIND.

No

Representation ID: 4666

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Peter Dowding

see replies to questions

No

Representation ID: 4669

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mandy Gaffney

Disagree with Site 9 being developed to enable a new secondary school.
Under 500 homes should be built (sic).
Arden Academy is already very successful, and received significant investment in recent years.
State of the art facilities do not equal results.
Knowle is a village, this scale of development will turn it into a town.
Facilities are already in Solihull.
Will ruin village character.
Loss of wildlife.

Yes

Representation ID: 4671

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: A Andrews

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built providing less than 500 dwellings as don't wish to see area overcrowded.

No

Representation ID: 4675

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Terry Corns

- A view is emerging that a new school could be of benefit to the community but the price to pay for those benefits in terms of the consequential impacts on infrastructure, landscape, and access to countryside that would result from 750 houses is unnecessarily high.
- too many basic questions being left unanswered for the NF to reach a view on what a reasonable reduced housing number might be.
- site is poor in accessibility terms and represents an unacceptable location for new housing development.

No

Representation ID: 4676

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Peter Glynn

site 9 objection

No

Representation ID: 4686

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Terry Grove

see replies to questions