09 Knowle - South of Knowle

No

Representation ID: 4687

Received: 16/02/2017

Respondent: Gill Corns

- A view is emerging that a new school could be of benefit to the community but the price to pay for those benefits in terms of the consequential impacts on infrastructure, landscape, and access to countryside that would result from 750 houses is unnecessarily high.
- too many basic questions being left unanswered for the NF to reach a view on what a reasonable reduced housing number might be.
- site is poor in accessibility terms and represents an unacceptable location for new housing development.

Yes

Representation ID: 4692

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Adam Barlow

Support development of Site 9 to enable a new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 dwellings.

No

Representation ID: 4694

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs N Harris

Object to development of Site 9 as would be detrimental to village character, the area has taken ample new housing over last few years, and there is no need for a new school.

Yes

Representation ID: 4696

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs D Baynham

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings, development that is in keeping with area.

No

Representation ID: 4697

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jackie Howson

Object to development of Site 9 as should be less than 500 houses with no flats/apartments, well spaced with at least one garage and 2 parking spaces to reduce risk of parking on road, with reasonable sized pavement (submission incomplete).

No

Representation ID: 4698

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Chris Hughes

Object to development of Site 9 as too large, should be less than 500 houses and school should restrict catchment area.

Yes

Representation ID: 4699

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Sarah Bees

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings.

Yes

Representation ID: 4701

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: M Biggs

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to saving village feel and community, green space and countryside.

No

Representation ID: 4705

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A V Kirby

Object to development of site 9 as should remain as green fields.

Yes

Representation ID: 4708

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs S Butcher Jones

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings, as existing school not fit for purpose.

No

Representation ID: 4709

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Gregory Kirby

see response

No

Representation ID: 4711

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Chris Kirk

Object to development on Site 9 as road, parking, shopping infrastructure of Knowle is insufficient to cope with more than an extra 50 houses, will destroy village feel of Knowle/Dorridge, and school is centre of community and should act responsibly in this process.

Yes

Representation ID: 4717

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Simon Bore

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.

No

Representation ID: 4718

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Paul Lamaison

Object to additional houses proposed for Site 9.

No

Representation ID: 4719

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Andy McCabe

Object to development of Site 9 as should be less than 500 houses, Knowle will be over-developed and additional traffic will add to existing heavy congestion.

Yes

Representation ID: 4720

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: C Blakey

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings.

No

Representation ID: 4721

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs Alison McWilliam

see response

Yes

Representation ID: 4722

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Jeevan Bhurra

Support development of Site 9 subject to less than 500 dwellings.

No

Representation ID: 4723

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Alan McWilliam

Object to development of Site 9 as the Arden school should not be part of the solution for the national housing shortage, Knowle/Dorridge cannot accommodate such expansion and there are already public sports facilities available in the Borough.

Yes

Representation ID: 4724

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Liz Cantone

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings and provision of smaller affordable housing for first time buyers.

Yes

Representation ID: 4726

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Johanne Boles

Support development of site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 houses, as current school too small and fragmented and cannot accommodate the large number of pupils it takes.

Yes

Representation ID: 4727

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Julia Carter

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to provision of affordable housing and improvements to infrastructure such as schools and medical services to serve increased population.

Yes

Representation ID: 4728

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr B Bohanna

Support development of site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built subject to less than 500 houses, lower density than proposal and better infrastructure with safer access.

Yes

Representation ID: 4729

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Rachel Caswell

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built.

Yes

Representation ID: 4730

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Frances Bate

Support development of Site 9 to enable new secondary school to be built, subject to less than 500 dwellings.

No

Representation ID: 4776

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Ben Merrell

Object to development of Site 9 as should be less than 500 houses.

No

Representation ID: 4777

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A E Millner

Object to development of Site 9 as should be less than 500 houses and concerned about level of provision for social housing and how development would affect planned footpath diversion.

No

Representation ID: 4778

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: David Norris

Object to development of Site 9 as land is and should be retained as green belt, Knowle would lose its village character, and the relationship with a property developer appears open to corruption.

No

Representation ID: 4779

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Yvonne & Stephen Palin

Object to development of Site 9 as would like Knowle to remain as it is with green areas and treed walkways, and catchment to school should be limited to Knowle and Dorridge to avoid unnecessary traffic, but if unavoidable should be less than 300 houses with design of school in keeping with Knowle, entrance to Grove Road to avoid conflict with emergency vehicles using Station Road, and additional parking required.

No

Representation ID: 4780

Received: 17/02/2017

Respondent: Ann Marie Pryce

Object to development of Site 9.