Site 4 - West of Dickens Heath
Further to my response submitted in December 2017, I am submitting further information and points as such a major housing allocation close to our Parish that will have a significant adverse effect on our Parish. They are on both the principle of the Site 4 allocation and the SMBC Illustrative Emerging Concept Masterplan.
The only reason for the choice of this site for new housing is its location close to Whitlocks End railway station but detailed analysis shows that it is not sustainable and should be considered as a red not a green site in terms of sustainability analysis. The combined significant adverse effects given below from developing the land west of Dickens Heath makes the proposal wholly inappropriate in terms of sound planning practise, and both national and local planning policies.
On the negative side, Dickens Heath has increased from the original design of 850 dwellings to approximately 1,800 units today. However, the roads and infrastructure have not been improved to accommodate this increase plus the vast number of dwellings given planning permission in the general area in the last few years. The Site lies outside Dickens Heath village and has no direct physical connection to it. Given the parking problems in the centre, the rural narrow roads and historic hedgerows, it will be difficult to make sufficient road improvements to take much more traffic. In addition, Site 4 is a high performing Green Belt site; there are the most Local Wildlife Sites surrounding than any other of the proposed allocations being 4 in all with protected species inhabiting the Site; there are ancient hedgerow; the land is liable to flooding as the sub-soil is deep boulder clay that does not allow adequate percolation; the site is not within walking distance from the facilities in the Village Centre; there would be a loss of character and identity as Site 4 is outside the confined boundaries; the Site is in an area of landscape sensitive to development; there would be a loss playing fields with no alternative proposals submitted.
No other proposed site in the Draft Local Plan has such adverse effects if developed and should therefore be removed from the proposed allocation for development.
Dickens Heath has experienced considerable development until recently and cannot take much more development. More development is happening at Tidbury Green following recent Appeals. Just because there is a nearby railway station is not enough to justify further major development of Dickens Heath. Every other planning factor points to the unsuitability of Site 4 for development. The cumulative adverse effect of the range of evidence set out above make Site 4 contrary to a range of local and national planning policies.

I therefore strongly urge Solihull Council to:
* delete from Site 4 the land between Birchy Leasowes Lane, Tilehouse Lane, Tythe Barn Lane, and the private road Birchy Close Dickens Heath, from the emerging Local Plan Review for the many reasons given above, and
* retain the field between Akamba, Tythe Barn Lane and the Stratford Canal for up to 100 dwellings as a sustainable extension of Dickens Heath.