Your report states "Site 12 is within a parcel of moderately performing Green Belt, and given the existing field structure, does not have a clear contiguous defensible Green Belt boundary to the south. This will need to be provided by a strong edge to the proposed development e.g. a new road, which will demarcate the built-up area from the surrounding countryside and provide a meaningful gap with Cheswick Green" This is an inaccurate statement as the "site" currently has a very clear boundary (eg Dog Kennel Lane), developing on this site will clearly start to in fill between Shirley, Monkspath and Cheswick green directly conflicting with the declared intent to have a "meaningful gap with Cheswick Green"

Additionally, the existing road capacity in this area is already inadequate - I would be surprised if the council are not aware of the rush hour queues into, and out of, Dickens Heath, along Dog Kennel Lane and the Stratford Road towards the M42. With the additional developments around Dickens Heath, Cheswick Green, Tidbury Green and the proposed developments in The Green and land south of Dog Kennel Lane the whole area will become grid locked and access to proposed school will surely be difficult / dangerous at best.