Object

Representation ID: 8390

Received: 14/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Darren Douglas

amber sites 134, 205 and 308
The inclusion of Amber omitted sites gives the promoters of these sites a 'way in' which in our view is contrary to the Council's own assessment and conclusions reached.
We do not agree with the methodology of the site selection process. On the basis the Council have identified sites to assess, assessed them against the site hierarchy and categorised the sites as an allocation, potential allocation, unlikely allocation and no allocation, it is not 'good planning' to then ignore this assessment and consult on the Amber omitted sites.