Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8487
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Simon Taylor
- I do not believe that site 11 should be included if both sites 4 and 12 are also included, due to the inequitable scale of proposed development in the Blythe area versus those of other areas, which simply cannot be justified.
- However, of the 3 sites (4, 11 and 12) this site makes the most sense for development given that there is already existing development in place and therefore it does not have such a radical effect on Green Belt land.
As noted in my response to questions 12 and 14 of this consultation, I do not believe that site 11 should be included if both sites 4 and 12 are also included, due to the inequitable scale of proposed development in the Blythe area versus those of other areas, which simply cannot be justified. However, of the 3 sites (4, 11 and 12) this site makes the most sense for development given that there is already existing development in place and therefore it does not have such a radical effect on Green Belt land