Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8502
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Simon Taylor
- No, I do not believe it is right that in all cases these sites should be omitted.
- Sites 59, 104, 109, 188, 205 and 413 should all be included, as they appear to represent justifiable development opportunities.
- As outlined above, to simply choose sites based on current assessment criteria is significantly flawed as in direct contradiction to the Local Plan, not considering demarcation of existing settlements and with no cap to the percentage increase at each respective area).
- Furthermore, the extension of green belt required is no different to that being proposed in other settlement areas.
No, I do not believe it is right that in all cases these sites should be omitted. I believe sites 59, 104, 109, 188, 205 and 413 should all be included, as they appear to represent justifiable development opportunities. As outlined above, to simply chose sites based on current assessment criteria is significantly flawed as it is in direct contradiction to the Local Plan, not considering demarcation of existing settlements and with no cap to the percentage increase at each respective area). Furthermore, the extension of green belt required is no different to that being proposed in other settlement areas.