Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9004
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Councillor Max McLoughlin
Whilst this is a necessary question, I envisage only developers will respond.
The reason being, the site assessment document is separate. It is some 674 pages long. It is an unrealistic ask for residents to contribute, except on sites they have already become aware of. Even then, the likelihood of them finding the exact site is low.
Whilst this is a necessary question, I envisage only developers will respond.
The reason being, the site assessment document is separate. It is some 674 pages long. It is an unrealistic ask for residents to contribute, except on sites they have already become aware of. Even then, the likelihood of them finding the exact site is low.