Question 8 - Site 22 - Travellion Stud
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6583
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: Mr Leslie Noble
This site is near the station and would allow easy access into Birmingham and Coventry
This site is near the station and would allow easy access into Birmingham and Coventry
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6619
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Mr Harry Siggs
Plan is supposed to avoid adding population in areas without transport infrastructure and local employment. Balsall Common is specifically identified as lacking in local services and in local employment. No plans are given for new business premises
Plan is supposed to avoid adding population in areas without transport infrastructure and local employment. Balsall Common is specifically identified as lacking in local services and in local employment. No plans are given for new business premises
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6622
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Mr Harry Siggs
Plan is supposed to avoid adding population in areas without transport infrastructure and local employment. Balsall Common is specifically identified as lacking in local services and in local employment. No plans are given for new business premises
Plan is supposed to avoid adding population in areas without transport infrastructure and local employment. Balsall Common is specifically identified as lacking in local services and in local employment. No plans are given for new business premises
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6826
Received: 26/02/2019
Respondent: Dr & Mrs Robert & Jennifer Leeming
Housing density inappropriately high. Wootton Green Lane is single track and floods, access to A452 dangerous and already difficult, particularly at peak times. Access to Wootton Lane towards Barston and Knowle is also single track and already dangerous.
Two ponds support wildlife (amphibia, birds and fish) which is being displaced in Balsall Common are not included in the plans presented? Extension of building at this side of the village encroaches on the Meriden Gap .
Housing density inappropriately high. Wootton Green Lane is single track and floods, access to A452 dangerous and already difficult, particularly at peak times. Access to Wootton Lane towards Barston and Knowle is also single track and already dangerous.
Two ponds support wildlife (amphibia, birds and fish) which is being displaced in Balsall Common are not included in the plans presented? Extension of building at this side of the village encroaches on the Meriden Gap .
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6928
Received: 04/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Richard Burgess
This site is too large and will destroy the rural nature of this part of the village. Wooton Green Lane is one of the few remaining roads in Balsall Common. The addition of so many new homes will be detrimental to the quality of life for current residents and those who currently use the road to safely cycle and walk. The two new proposed access points onto Wootton Green Lane will make it a busy thoroughfare and necessitate an upgrade from rural lane to urban road.
This site is too large and will destroy the rural nature of this part of the village. Wooton Green Lane is one of the few remaining roads in Balsall Common. The addition of so many new homes will be detrimental to th3 quality of life for current residents and those who currently use the road to safely cycle and walk. The two new proposed access points onto Wootton Green Lane will make it a busy thoroughfare and necessitate an upgrade from rural lane to urban road.
Wootton Green Lane is as the name suggest a rural road, one of the few remaining 8n the village. this proposed development will destroy its character for ever. The access points from the development into the lane will put far too much traffic on it for the safety of walkers etc who flock here daily because it is so peaceful a place.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6941
Received: 04/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Barbara Hedley
There is already ribbon development along Wootten Green Lane, and the area is of limited landscape value. Nor will it be widely prominent as new development.
There is already ribbon development along Wootten Green Lane, and the area is of limited landscape value. Nor will it be widely prominent as new development.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7118
Received: 07/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Paul Joyner
Brown field and non public access
Brown field and non public access
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7234
Received: 09/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Kennedy
Given the need for additional housig, I support the proposal.
Given the need for additional housig, I support the proposal.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7300
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Richard Davis
Support
Support
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7492
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Portland Planning Consultants
It is considered this site is poorly related to employment facilities and very intrusive into the openness of the Green Belt.
It is considered this site is poorly related to employment facilities and very intrusive into the openness of the Green Belt.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7539
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Kevin Thomas
I would support development of this brownfield site
I would support development of this brownfield site
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7629
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: BFNAG
Building on brownfield sites is preferable and although it is currently Green Belt it is not in the narrowest part of the Meriden Gap.
Building on brownfield sites is preferable and although it is currently Green Belt it is not in the narrowest part of the Meriden Gap.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7651
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Judith Thomas
I support development of this brownfield site in priority to other greenfield sites
I support development of this brownfield site in priority to other greenfield sites
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7664
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Keith Tindall
This is overdevelopment in a rural environment, and concerning that an access road feeds onto Wooton Green Lane, a single track country lane. All access/egress from the site must be onto the A452 trunk road. It is also a considerable distance from the railway station, medical centre and other public amenities and therefore does not meet the SNBC sustainability requirements for such development.
This is overdevelopment in a rural environment, and concerning that an access road feeds onto Wooton Green Lane, a single track country lane. All access/egress from the site must be onto the A452 trunk road. It is also a considerable distance from the railway station, medical centre and other public amenities and therefore does not meet the SNBC sustainability requirements for such development.
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7730
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Hughes
The access point to the site is a single track lane, not enough capacity to support 300 extra cars.
Only about 30% of the site is previously developed land so question why the whole site is being removed from the Green Belt.
Concern that if this site goes forward, the village will become a small town, without the infrastructure to support the residents.
Construction disruption from HS2 and housing sites.
see attached letter
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7770
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Wheeler
I support this proposal. This site is largely brown field, has good access from the A452 and is reasonably close to facilities. It would also remove some pressure on numbers required in other more sensitive areas.
I support this proposal. This site is largely brown field, has good access from the A452 and is reasonably close to facilities. It would also remove some pressure on numbers required in other more sensitive areas.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7832
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Councillor D Bell
Yes to being included as used as part brownfield.
Methodology.
I do not agree if Balsall Common station is counted as equal to Dorridge.
Infrastructure
We need infrastructure. Green spaces, sports facilities, parking,improvements to very limited.centre.
Site 1 Barrett's Farm
I reluctantly agree to its inclusion.
Site 2 and 3
I do not agree to their inclusion as they are do far from amenities.my neighbour has to get a taxi to the shops.also they have considerable worth as greenfield and wildlife havens.
Trevallion Stud and Pheasant oak Farm.
Yes to being included as
Used as part brownfield.
Concept plans. Good idea but need much more work especially in guarding development from existing gardens
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7920
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Mr. John Peake
This area of historic pastureland should remain in the green belt, and is wholly unsuitable for housing development. Any past development of the Stud to include it as a Brownfield site indicates non-permitted development that SMBC should have been acted on contravenions. The site is on the extremity of the village and development,would contribute to A452 "sprawl" with a negative impact by increased
vehicle use with pollution and be distant from services. There is some merit in additional housing site allocation at the Kenilworth end of the village up to a bypass construction at that point,as a viable alternative.
This area of historic pastureland should remain in the green belt, and is wholly unsuitable for housing development. Any past development of the Stud to include it as a Brownfield site indicates non-permitted development that SMBC should have been acted on contravenions. The site is on the extremity of the village and development,would contribute to A452 "sprawl" with a negative impact by increased
vehicle use with pollution and be distant from services. There is some merit in additional housing site allocation at the Kenilworth end of the village up to a bypass construction at that point,as a viable alternative.
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7979
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Izumi Segawa
If you need to tackle the housing deficiency, build more flats in the town centre.
If you need to tackle the housing deficiency, build more flats in the town centre.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8056
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Countryside Planning Services Limited
Agent: Countryside Planning Services Limited
I agree that Site 22 Trevallion Stud should be included as an allocated site. It has hard, defendable boundaries to limit further expansion into Green Belt land; it is well located to the village and its amenities, close enough that private vehicles may not always be used to reach the village centre.
The Master Plan Report and Site Assessments for each parcel of land within it and the vicinity provide a clear justification for allocating this area of housing development, with the consequential need to release it from the Green Belt.
I agree that Site 22 Trevallion Stud should be included as an allocated site. It has hard, defendable boundaries to limit further expansion into Green Belt land; it is well located to the village and its amenities, close enough that private vehicles may not always be used to reach the village centre.
The Master Plan Report and Site Assessments for each parcel of land within it and the vicinity provide a clear justification for allocating this area of housing development, with the consequential need to release it from the Green Belt.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8057
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: S Edwards
Agent: Countryside Planning Services Limited
I believe that Site 22 Trevallion Stud should be included as an allocated site. In addition the Development Plan should include site 159 (of the initial consultation) within its allocation of land for housing purposes. This is located in the vicinity of the Trevallion Stud but falls outside the Master Plan boundary. Including Site 159, in the Development Plan but outside the Master Plan area for site 22 will allow a phased development of land in this area. Due to the brownfield nature of the site, bringing forward Site 159 before the remainder of Site 22 will be beneficial.
I believe that Site 22 Trevallion Stud should be included as an allocated site. In addition the Development Plan should include site 159 (of the initial consultation) within its allocation of land for housing purposes. This is located in the vicinity of the Trevallion Stud but falls outside the Master Plan boundary. Including Site 159, in the Development Plan but outside the Master Plan area for site 22 will allow a phased development of land in this area. Due to the brownfield nature of the site, bringing forward Site 159 before the remainder of Site 22 will be beneficial.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8089
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Sheila Cooper
I support the allocation of Brown Field Sites and, therefore welcome the addition of the Trevallion Stud on the allocation of sites.
See attached document
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8135
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Felicity Wheeler
Building on brownfield sites is preferable and although it is currently Green Belt it is not in the narrowest part of the Meriden Gap.
Building on brownfield sites is preferable and although it is currently Green Belt it is not in the narrowest part of the Meriden Gap.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8174
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Richard Drake
Brownfield sites should be built on first. However, the plan is unappealing. Although in Balsall Parish it would be improved if the ideas in the Berkswell NDP were adopted.
Brownfield sites should be built on first. However, the plan is unappealing. Although in Balsall Parish it would be improved if the ideas in the Berkswell NDP were adopted.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8201
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Caroline Drake
Brownfield should be developed first.
Concept Masterplan
Site plan is poor.
Brownfield should be developed first.
Site plan is poor
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8261
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Turley
Agent: Turley
The proposed allocation at Trevallion Stud is generally supported, although the incorporation of site ref 172 of the LPA's 'Site Assessment' document within the proposed allocation site (as shown on the Concept Masterplan drawing) is questioned, since that land area forms part of a separate land ownership, on which separate representations have been made by Turley in the 'Any Other Issues' Chapter. In our view site ref 172 should be removed from the Green Belt, but not allocated for housing.
The proposed allocation at Trevallion Stud is generally supported, although the incorporation of site ref 172 of the LPA's "Site Assessment" document within the proposed allocation site (as shown on the Concept Masterplan" drawing) is questioned, since that land area forms part of a separate land ownership, on which separate representations have been made by Turley in the "Any Other Issues" Chapter. In our view site ref 172 should be removed from the Green Belt, but not allocated for housing.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8428
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Diane Howell
This site contains a proportion of brownfield, however we will still lose greenspace. Vital that TPOs are applied to the mature oak trees and hedegrows retained where possible.
This site contains a proportion of brownfield, however we will still lose greenspace. Vital that TPOs are applied to the mature oak trees and hedegrows retained where possible.
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8653
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Gerard Hudson
Wootton Green Lane narrows in places and after a short run of approx 30 houses becomes effectively a country lane. My understanding is that the area of Green Belt surrounding it will be reduced. The area is surrounded by unspoilt countryside and is popular with dog walkers and ramblers. I believe the proposal to build up to 300 houses nearby will negatively affect the area and encroach further into the countryside.
Wootton Green Lane narrows in places and after a short run of approx 30 houses becomes effectively a country lane. My understanding is that the area of Green Belt surrounding it will be reduced. The area is surrounded by unspoilt countryside and is popular with dog walkers and ramblers. I believe the proposal to build up to 300 houses nearby will negatively affect the area and encroach further into the countryside.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8676
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Greig File
This seems to make more sense than the windmill lane proposal, although more details are needed to assess the environmental impact
This seems to make more sense than the windmill lane proposal, although more details are needed to assess the environmental impact
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8733
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Andrea Baker
Balsall Common is already being subjected to far more new houses per capita of the existing development, without the need to destroy more of our farm land and green belt.
Balsall Common is already being subjected to far more new houses per capita of the existing development, without the need to destroy more of our farm land and green belt.