Question 27 - Site 17 - Moat Lane/Vulcan Road
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6805
Received: 24/02/2019
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Bridge
Ok
Ok
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 6865
Received: 28/02/2019
Respondent: Mr Tony Moon
Its a brown field site , an ideal option
Its a brown field site , an ideal option
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7426
Received: 11/03/2019
Respondent: Colin Davis
The site is a thriving industrial estate. It makes no sense to displace these business and make them move.
The site is a thriving industrial estate. It makes no sense to displace these business and make them move.
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 7622
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Jim Burton
I do not see any mention regarding possible congestion due to increased traffic loading along Lode Lane. This is by a school and may present a danger to pupils.
I do not see any mention regarding possible congestion due to increased traffic loading along Lode Lane. This is by a school and may present a danger to pupils.
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8015
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Reeve
This area is well suited for housing and will fit in well with the wharf lane development
This area is well suited for housing and will fit in well with the wharf lane development
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8550
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: SMBC Strategic Land and Property Team - Site S02
Agent: Cushman and Wakefield
Allocation of this land will provide a sustainable location for new residential development to help the Borough achieve its housing requirement within the plan period and is therefore supported. SMBC own the site. Site PO17 is located in an existing residential area north of Solihull Town Centre, with existing access on to Moat Lane and strong existing road infrastructure connecting the site along the A41 to M42 junction 5. The site is a brownfield site with close proximity to local facilities and services along and being situated in an established residential area is in a sustainable location for development.
Please find full document attached.
Cushman and Wakefield (C&W) have been appointed by the Strategic Land and Property Team of Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC) (acting in the Council's capacity as land owner) to submit this representation in support of the allocation of Site PO17 Moat Lane Depot & Vulcan House for residential development as part of the Draft Local Plan Review Supplementary Consultation (2019).
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 8986
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Councillor Max McLoughlin
Yes
The facilities in this location are in need of improvement. It is in a strategically important location. As such development should be welcomed.
There will be concern that replacement facilities are provided for and that the redevelopment is not inicative of jobs being cut at the Council. Whilst this is not the remit entirely of the plan, it can play a role in addressing any potential concerns in future iterations.
Yes
The facilities in this location are in need of improvement. It is in a strategically important location. As such development should be welcomed.
There will be concern that replacement facilities are provided for and that the redevelopment is not inicative of jobs being cut at the Council. Whilst this is not the remit entirely of the plan, it can play a role in addressing any potential concerns in future iterations.
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9275
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: IM Land
Agent: Barton Willmore Planning
This Site is an existing industrial estate and the Council should ensure that any loss of employment provision is acceptable. This should be evidenced. Further to this, the Council should ensure that any retained employment provision is not adversely impacted by the creation of a noise-sensitive use close by.
Further to this, given the Site has an industrial use currently, the Council should evidence that the Site is deliverable within the required timeframes and that there are not issues (such as contaminated land) which will prohibit the delivery of the Site or its viability.
See Letters
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9323
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Strategic Land and Property Team SMBC
Agent: Cushman and Wakefield
Allocation of this land will provide a sustainable location for new residential development to help the Borough achieve its housing requirement within the plan period.
The site is outside the Green Belt and performs well in terms of accessibility and the use of previously developed land. Infrastructure requirements are noted to ensure deliverability.
Potential land contamination and existing onsite lease agreements are identified as constraints to the site. Despite these, the site is a brownfield site in a sustainable location surrounded by established residential development.
See Letters 1-5
Support
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9339
Received: 21/03/2019
Respondent: Halford Holdings
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
See Letter
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9379
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr. James McBride
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Given that there are likely to be significant site preparation costs, it seems inappropriate for the site to be allocated for development for 200 dwellings without a
detailed viability assessment. Until this evidence work has been carried out, we
contend that the site does not satisfy the national policy requirements
See letters 1-4
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9563
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Richard Cobb Planning
The relocation of the old Council Depot to a site more central in the M42 Gateway area would be sensible, but the remaining Boulton Road/Vulcan Road business uses are an employment asset which is irreplaceable. No provision is made in the Plan for relocating those uses and there must be a question mark therefore whether that site can be delivered.
Please find attached a response to various aspects of the supplementary consultation
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9638
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: David Wilson Homes
Agent: Barton Willmore Planning
As shown on the 'Masterplan Document' published with the consultation, David Wilson Homes had some previous involvement with the Moat Lane site .They are no longer actively involved with this site due the difficulties in delivering a commercially viable scheme.
We do not consider this site to be a deliverable site and it should therefore removed from the draft Plan.
We are instructed by our client, David Wilson Homes Ltd, to submit representations to the supplementary consultation on the Draft Local Plan Review in relation to their interests at their site at Tidbury Green Golf Club (known as Arden Green).
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9657
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Michael & Marion Joyce
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
On behalf of our Client Mrs M Joyce, we now formally submit on her behalf representations in connection with the Draft Solihull Local Plan Review Supplementary Consultation.
The key question raised in the DSLPRSC is Question 39, which offers
an opportunity for our client to confirm she wishes her site to be included and the
reasons for that. In addition, this representation also addresses the following
questions: 2, 7, 14, 15, 17, 18, 23, 27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 39 and 44.
see letter attached
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9680
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Kendrick Homes Ltd
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
We write on behalf of our Client, Kendrick Homes Limited, who have an interest in land to the north side of School Road, Hockley Heath - referred to as Land adjacent 84 School Road (Site Ref: 49) within the Council's current Draft Solihull Local Plan Review Supplementary Consultation (DSLPRSC).
see details in attached letter
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9690
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Belle Homes Ltd
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
We write on behalf of our Client, Belle Homes Limited in respect of Land to the rear of 575a to 601 Tanworth Lane and Numbers 587 to 601 Tanworth Lane, Cheswick Green, Solihull B90 4JE. This letter is submitted in response to the current Draft Solihull Local Plan Review Supplementary Consultation (DSLPRSC
See detail in attached letter
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9706
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Landowners Wootton Green Lane
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
We write on behalf of our various Clients, who jointly own land described below:
Proposed Allocated Housing Site 22 - Trevallion Stud, Wootton Green
Lane, Balsall Common CV7 7BQ
Also including consideration of land west of No. 32 Wootton Green Lane Site
Reference 160
see detail in attached letter
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9926
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Generator (Balsall) & Minton
Agent: DS Planning
Potential conflict with employment Policy P3 on retention of employment
land. Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within
Solihull? No indication is given within the Plan of such an option. This calls
into question the delivery of the site.
This is the response of Generator Group and Minton to the supplementary
consultation by Solihull Council on the Solihull Draft Local Plan January 2019. The
purpose of the response is to comment on the draft Plan and promote the site on land adj Harpers Field, Kenilworth Road Balsall Common for inclusion as a housing
allocation within the Plan. The response is by question order. Whilst we have
responded to each question, the detailed points in relation to our site are set out under question 39 and your attention is specifically drawn to this part of the response. It should be noted the site is developer owned and delivery of the site can therefore come forward early in the plan period
Comment
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 9973
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Rosconn Stategic Land
Agent: DS Planning
Potential conflict with employment Policy P3 on retention of employment
land. Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within
Solihull? No indication is given within the Plan of such an option. This calls
into question the deliverability of the site.
This is the response of Rosconn Strategic Land to the supplementary consultation by
Solihull Council on the Solihull Draft Local Plan January 2019. The purpose of the
response is to comment the draft Plan and promote three sites for inclusion as
housing allocations within the plan. The response is by question order.
The 3 sites are:
Land at Three Maypoles Farm Shirley
Land at r/o 2214 Stratford Road Hockley Heath
Land adj 161 Lugtrout Lane Solihull
The responses on the three sites to the Solihull Draft Local Plan 2016 consultation
are attached and which highlight the reasons why the sites should be allocations
within the Local Plan.
This document should also be read in conjunction with the Ecology Report and
Heritage Assessment in relation to land adj to 161 Lugtrout Lane, Solihull.
Your attention is also drawn to the attached Masterplan for land r/o 2214 Stratford
Road Hockley Heath.
Not withstanding that this is an informal consultation we consider that the document
should be accompanied by an up to date SA.
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 10013
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Stonewater
Agent: DS Planning
Potential conflict with employment Policy P3 on retention of employment
land. Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within
Solihull? No indication is given within the Plan of such an option. This calls
into question the deliverability of the site.
This is the response of Stonewater to the supplementary consultation by Solihull
Council on the Solihull Draft Local Plan January 2019. The purpose of the response is
to comment the draft Plan and promote the site at the Firs Maxstoke Lane (west of
Meriden proposed allocation site 10) for inclusion as a housing allocation within the
Plan. The response is by question order.
The original response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan 2016 consultation is also
attached which highlights the reasons why the site should be an allocation within the
Local Plan (Site Ref 137).
see detailed comment in attached letter
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 10053
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Mr T Khan
Agent: DS Planning
Potential conflict with employment Policy P3 on retention of employment
land. Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within
Solihull? No indication is given within the Plan of such an option. This calls
into question the deliverability of the site.
This is the response of Mr Taj Khan, Sid Kelly and John Green to the supplementary
consultation by Solihull Council on the Solihull Draft Local Plan January 2019. The
purpose of the response is to comment on the draft Plan and promote the site at 15,
59, & 61 Jacobean Lane Knowle for inclusion as a housing allocation within the Plan
and land north of Jacobean Lane being removed from the Green Belt and to support
the removal of land from the Green Belt to rectify anomalies and for consistency.
See detail response in attached letter and appendices
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 10095
Received: 15/03/2019
Respondent: Minton (CdeB) Ltd
Agent: DS Planning
Potential conflict with employment Policy P3 on retention of employment land. Relocation of employment uses may be an option but to where within Solihull?
No indication is given within the Plan of such an option. This calls into question the deliverability of the site.
This is the response of Minton to the supplementary consultation by Solihull Council
on the Solihull Draft Local Plan January 2019. The purpose of the response is to
comment the draft Plan and promote the site at Oak Farm Catherine de Barnes for
inclusion as a housing allocation within the Plan. The response is by question order.
The original response to the Solihull Draft Local Plan 2016 consultation is also
attached which highlights the reasons why the full Oak Farm site should be an
allocation within the Local Plan. We have also carried out our own Green Belt
Assessment a copy of which is attached
Object
Draft Local Plan - Supplementary Consultation
Representation ID: 10179
Received: 14/03/2019
Respondent: Mr P Benton and Mr T Neary
Agent: Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The 5 ha urban site is expected to deliver approximately 200 dwellings. However,
the viability of the site for residential development has not been tested and the
potential land contamination on the site is unknown. Recommendation in concept masterplan that consideration given to relocation or removal of the telecommunications mast if possible.
Deliverability not demonstrated and should not be allocated.
See Letters